Rachel Jones

2.1k total citations · 1 hit paper
45 papers, 1.5k citations indexed

About

Rachel Jones is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Sociology and Political Science and Epidemiology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Jones has authored 45 papers receiving a total of 1.5k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in General Health Professions, 11 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 10 papers in Epidemiology. Recurrent topics in Rachel Jones's work include Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (14 papers), Sex work and related issues (7 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers). Rachel Jones is often cited by papers focused on Adolescent Sexual and Reproductive Health (14 papers), Sex work and related issues (7 papers) and HIV/AIDS Research and Interventions (7 papers). Rachel Jones collaborates with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Rachel Jones's co-authors include Donald R. Hoover, Elsie E. Gulick, Timothy Geraghty, Michele Foster, Simon Barton, Letitia Burridge, Elizabeth Kendall, Melissa Legg, Mandy Nielsen and Jennifer Fleming and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature reviews. Neuroscience, Nature Reviews Genetics and Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Jones

45 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Worms gang up on bacteria 2002 2026 2010 2018 2002 200 400 600

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Jones United States 16 824 335 183 160 143 45 1.5k
James Murray United Kingdom 22 478 0.6× 174 0.5× 290 1.6× 212 1.3× 292 2.0× 69 1.6k
Lisa Mills United States 24 700 0.8× 174 0.5× 69 0.4× 72 0.5× 162 1.1× 56 1.9k
Joshua Galanter United States 17 410 0.5× 145 0.4× 64 0.3× 67 0.4× 151 1.1× 36 1.7k
Silke Dyer South Africa 25 296 0.4× 180 0.5× 111 0.6× 174 1.1× 75 0.5× 60 4.9k
Sheryl van der Poel United States 14 308 0.4× 128 0.4× 124 0.7× 94 0.6× 61 0.4× 23 3.4k
Bertha Hidalgo United States 14 222 0.3× 101 0.3× 314 1.7× 64 0.4× 137 1.0× 22 1.1k
Ainsley J. Newson Australia 25 545 0.7× 237 0.7× 104 0.6× 85 0.5× 35 0.2× 136 2.4k
Ann Danoff United States 21 306 0.4× 52 0.2× 261 1.4× 149 0.9× 187 1.3× 46 1.6k
Eiko Yamamoto Japan 28 672 0.8× 185 0.6× 107 0.6× 78 0.5× 275 1.9× 152 2.9k
Quan Chen United States 19 727 0.9× 124 0.4× 110 0.6× 63 0.4× 147 1.0× 63 1.6k

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Jones

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Jones's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Jones with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Jones more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Jones

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Jones. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Jones. The network helps show where Rachel Jones may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Jones

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Jones. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Jones based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Jones. Rachel Jones is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burns, Elaine, et al.. (2024). Investigating midwives and nurses reporting of ‘infant feeding at hospital discharge’: an online survey across NSW Australia. International Breastfeeding Journal. 19(1). 29–29. 1 indexed citations
2.
Burridge, Letitia, et al.. (2023). Methodologies to measure access to care post-discharge in adults with serious injury-related disability: a scoping review. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(7). 1266–1273. 1 indexed citations
3.
Xie, Yanfei, Mandy Nielsen, Melissa Kendall, et al.. (2023). Care Transitions for People with Acquired Neurological Disability in the First 12 Months following Inpatient Rehabilitation: Health Service Use and Obstacles. Health & Social Care in the Community. 2023. 1–16. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ownsworth, Tamara, Yanfei Xie, Melissa Kendall, et al.. (2023). Stigma following acquired brain injury and spinal cord injury: relationship to psychological distress and community integration in the first-year post-discharge. Disability and Rehabilitation. 46(9). 1796–1806. 12 indexed citations
6.
7.
Borg, David N., Michele Foster, Melissa Legg, et al.. (2020). The Effect of Health Service Use, Unmet Need, and Service Obstacles on Quality of Life and Psychological Well-Being in the First Year After Discharge From Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation. 101(7). 1162–1169. 14 indexed citations
9.
Jones, Rachel, et al.. (2019). The role of stigma and trauma in hepatitis C virus treatment in veterans: Applying the common‐sense model. Public Health Nursing. 36(6). 829–835. 3 indexed citations
10.
Burridge, Letitia, et al.. (2019). Nurses’ Perspectives of Person-Centered Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation in a Digital Hospital. Rehabilitation Nursing. 45(5). 263–270. 6 indexed citations
11.
Burridge, Letitia, et al.. (2017). Person-centred care in a digital hospital: observations and perspectives from a specialist rehabilitation setting. Australian Health Review. 42(5). 529–535. 12 indexed citations
12.
Jones, Rachel, et al.. (2017). Facebook Advertising to Recruit Young, Urban Women into an HIV Prevention Clinical Trial. AIDS and Behavior. 21(11). 3141–3153. 26 indexed citations
13.
Jones, Rachel. (2013). Soap opera video episodes streamed to smartphones in a randomized controlled trial to reduce HIV sex risk in young urban African American/black women. 141st APHA Annual Meeting and Exposition (November 2 - November 6, 2013). 1 indexed citations
14.
Sanatinia, Rahil, Barbara Barrett, Sarah Byford, et al.. (2012). Brief intervention for alcohol misuse in people attending sexual health clinics: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 13(1). 149–149. 4 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Rachel. (2011). Handheld Computers to Run ACASI to Assess HIV Risk and Deliver Tailored Soap Opera Video Feedback. Journal of the Association of Nurses in AIDS Care. 23(3). 260–267. 9 indexed citations
16.
Jones, Rachel, et al.. (2009). Long-Term Outcome of Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis (CAPD) Peritonitis: Surgery can be Avoided. Annals of The Royal College of Surgeons of England. 91(2). 118–122. 3 indexed citations
17.
Jones, Rachel, et al.. (2006). Young Urban Women’s Patterns of Unprotected Sex with Men Engaging in HIV Risk Behaviors. AIDS and Behavior. 11(6). 812–821. 43 indexed citations
18.
Jones, Rachel. (2004). Relationships of sexual imposition, dyadic trust, and sensation seeking with sexual risk behavior in young Urban women. Research in Nursing & Health. 27(3). 185–197. 40 indexed citations
19.
Jones, Rachel & Simon Barton. (2004). Introduction to history taking and principles of sexual health. Postgraduate Medical Journal. 80(946). 444–446. 8 indexed citations
20.
Jones, Rachel, et al.. (1988). Renal vascular thrombosis of cadaveric renal allografts in patients receiving cyclosporin, azathioprine and prednisolone triple therapy. Clinical Transplantation. 2(3). 122–126. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026