Rachel Hogg

560 total citations
18 papers, 302 citations indexed

About

Rachel Hogg is a scholar working on Surgery, Transplantation and Biomedical Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel Hogg has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 302 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 15 papers in Surgery, 7 papers in Transplantation and 5 papers in Biomedical Engineering. Recurrent topics in Rachel Hogg's work include Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (10 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (6 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers). Rachel Hogg is often cited by papers focused on Transplantation: Methods and Outcomes (10 papers), Renal Transplantation Outcomes and Treatments (6 papers) and Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes (6 papers). Rachel Hogg collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and South Sudan. Rachel Hogg's co-authors include Vipul Jairath, Kathryn Oakland, Michael Murphy, Richard Guy, Raman Uberoi, Neil Mortensen, Christopher J.E. Watson, Ian Currie, Andrew J. Butler and Gabriel C. Oniscu and has published in prestigious journals such as The Lancet, Annals of Surgery and Gut.

In The Last Decade

Rachel Hogg

15 papers receiving 295 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel Hogg United Kingdom 8 232 100 64 61 43 18 302
Emanuele Marciano Italy 8 208 0.9× 24 0.2× 28 0.4× 74 1.2× 53 1.2× 18 304
С. Ф. Багненко Russia 8 143 0.6× 15 0.1× 83 1.3× 43 0.7× 21 0.5× 92 252
Rosa Boyé Spain 6 328 1.4× 18 0.2× 15 0.2× 114 1.9× 211 4.9× 10 423
Radi Zaki United States 11 183 0.8× 8 0.1× 70 1.1× 92 1.5× 93 2.2× 37 281
Syed Shahyan Bakhtiyar United States 8 232 1.0× 5 0.1× 24 0.4× 34 0.6× 38 0.9× 81 325
Hamish Ireland United Kingdom 13 516 2.2× 31 0.3× 32 0.5× 556 9.1× 144 3.3× 26 732
Nazareno Smerieri Italy 9 324 1.4× 18 0.2× 11 0.2× 46 0.8× 43 1.0× 15 404
John K. Maring Netherlands 11 168 0.7× 5 0.1× 23 0.4× 91 1.5× 36 0.8× 15 270
Jeffrey Weinstein United States 10 180 0.8× 57 0.6× 11 0.2× 262 4.3× 12 0.3× 18 357
M Foco Italy 8 154 0.7× 11 0.1× 25 0.4× 51 0.8× 51 1.2× 16 205

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Hogg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Hogg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Hogg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Hogg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Hogg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Hogg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Hogg. The network helps show where Rachel Hogg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Hogg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Hogg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Hogg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Hogg. Rachel Hogg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Mumford, Lisa, Rachel Hogg, Peter Lanyon, et al.. (2025). Impact of SARS-CoV-2 spike antibody positivity on infection and hospitalisation rates in immunosuppressed populations during the omicron period: the MELODY study. The Lancet. 405(10475). 314–328. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pettit, Stephen, P. Kaul, Steven Tsui, et al.. (2024). Organ Care System (OCS) Perfusion Time During Donation After Circulatory Death (DCD) Heart Transplantation: Not Too Little, Not Too Much: There Safety Lie. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 43(4). S52–S53. 1 indexed citations
3.
Bhagra, Sai, Rachel Hogg, David P. Jenkins, et al.. (2024). Predictors of Severe Graft Dysfunction After DCD Heart Transplantation with Direct Procurement and Preservation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 43(4). S259–S259.
4.
Hogg, Rachel, Stephen Clark, Pedro Catarino, et al.. (2023). Risk of prolonged ischemic time linked to use of cardiopulmonary bypass during implantation for lung transplantation in the United Kingdom. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 42(10). 1378–1396. 5 indexed citations
5.
Pearce, Fiona, Sean H. Lim, Mary Bythell, et al.. (2023). Antibody prevalence after three or more COVID-19 vaccine doses in individuals who are immunosuppressed in the UK: a cross-sectional study from MELODY. The Lancet Rheumatology. 5(8). e461–e473. 11 indexed citations
7.
Oniscu, Gabriel C., Jennifer Mehew, Andrew J. Butler, et al.. (2022). Improved Organ Utilization and Better Transplant Outcomes With In Situ Normothermic Regional Perfusion in Controlled Donation After Circulatory Death. Transplantation. 107(2). 438–448. 77 indexed citations
8.
Hogg, Rachel, et al.. (2022). Primary Graft Dysfunction (PGD) After Lung Transplantation in the UK: Incidence, Risk Factors and Patient Outcome. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 41(4). S146–S146.
9.
Robb, Matthew, et al.. (2021). The Impact of Cold Ischaemia Time on Outcomes of Living Donor Kidney Transplantation in the UK Living Kidney Sharing Scheme. Annals of Surgery. 274(5). 859–865. 11 indexed citations
10.
Hogg, Rachel, Lisa Mumford, R. Quigley, et al.. (2021). Heart transplantation in the UK during the first wave of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic. Clinical Transplantation. 35(5). e14261–e14261. 4 indexed citations
11.
Hogg, Rachel, Lisa Mumford, Stephen Clark, et al.. (2020). The impact of the SARS‐CoV‐2 pandemic and COVID‐19 on lung transplantation in the UK: Lessons learned from the first wave. Clinical Transplantation. 35(3). e14210–e14210. 16 indexed citations
12.
Hogg, Rachel, et al.. (2020). Expanding Donor Age Criteria: The UK Experience. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 39(4). S377–S377. 1 indexed citations
13.
Hogg, Rachel, et al.. (2020). Lung Transplantation and Utilisation Following Donation after Circulatory Death (DCD) in the UK. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation. 39(4). S139–S139.
14.
Shaw, Steven M., Rajamiyer Venkateswaran, Rachel Hogg, et al.. (2018). Durable left ventricular assist device support as a bridge to heart transplant candidacy†. Interactive Cardiovascular and Thoracic Surgery. 28(4). 594–601. 2 indexed citations
15.
Kourliouros, Antonios, Rachel Hogg, Jenny Mehew, et al.. (2018). Patient outcomes from time of listing for lung transplantation in the UK: are there disease-specific differences?. Thorax. 74(1). 60–68. 25 indexed citations
16.
Parameshwar, J., Rachel Hogg, Rhiannon Taylor, et al.. (2018). Patient survival and therapeutic outcome in the UK bridge to transplant left ventricular assist device population. Heart. 105(4). 291–296. 11 indexed citations
17.
Oakland, Kathryn, Richard Guy, Raman Uberoi, et al.. (2017). Acute lower GI bleeding in the UK: patient characteristics, interventions and outcomes in the first nationwide audit. Gut. 67(4). gutjnl–2016. 124 indexed citations
18.
Hogg, Rachel, Elisa Allen, Andrew J. Butler, et al.. (2017). The Impact of Body Mass Index on Survival Following Intestinal and Multivisceral Transplantations in the United Kingdom. Transplantation. 101(6S2). S86–S86. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026