Rachel G. Rempell
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine top 5%
- Surgery
- Emergency Medicine
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
- Co-authors
- Jason A. LevyMark I. NeumanRebecca L. VieiraMichael C. MonuteauxMargaret LinJason Z. StollerMaría V. FragaKaren Boretsky
- Topics
- Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (10 papers)Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers)Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Critical Care and Intensive Care MedicineEmergency MedicineAnesthesiology and Pain Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesMalaysiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Rachel G. Rempell
12 papers receiving 148 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 33
- Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 111
- Surgery 67
- Emergency Medicine 42
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 40
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 28
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel G. Rempell
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel G. Rempell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel G. Rempell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel G. Rempell more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel G. Rempell
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel G. Rempell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel G. Rempell. The network helps show where Rachel G. Rempell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel G. Rempell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel G. Rempell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel G. Rempell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel G. Rempell. Rachel G. Rempell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 51 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 27 | |
| 9 | 10 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 19 |
About Rachel G. Rempell
Rachel G. Rempell is a scholar working on Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, having authored 12 papers that have together received 150 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound in Clinical Applications (10 papers), Emergency and Acute Care Studies (4 papers) and Airway Management and Intubation Techniques (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (111 citations), Emergency Medicine (42 citations) and Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (18 citations). Rachel G. Rempell has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Malaysia and France. Frequent co-authors include Jason A. Levy, Mark I. Neuman, Rebecca L. Vieira, Michael C. Monuteaux, Margaret Lin, Jason Z. Stoller, María V. Fraga, Karen Boretsky, Jesse Wenger and Danièle De Luca. Their work appears in journals such as PEDIATRICS, The American Journal of Emergency Medicine and Journal of Emergency Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.