Rachel E. Nally

630 total citations
8 papers, 551 citations indexed

About

Rachel E. Nally is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Molecular Biology and Neurology. According to data from OpenAlex, Rachel E. Nally has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 551 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, 3 papers in Molecular Biology and 3 papers in Neurology. Recurrent topics in Rachel E. Nally's work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). Rachel E. Nally is often cited by papers focused on Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (6 papers), Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (4 papers) and Receptor Mechanisms and Signaling (3 papers). Rachel E. Nally collaborates with scholars based in Ireland, Australia and United States. Rachel E. Nally's co-authors include Marina A. Lynch, Rebecca J. Griffin, Yvonne M. Nolan, James D. Linden, Rachael M. Clarke, Aedín M. Minogue, Aileen Lynch, Aine Marie Kelly, David J. Loane and Dana Kilroy and has published in prestigious journals such as Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Journal of Neurochemistry and Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Rachel E. Nally

8 papers receiving 548 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Rachel E. Nally Ireland 8 275 184 139 136 97 8 551
Mircea Oprica Sweden 14 261 0.9× 142 0.8× 129 0.9× 144 1.1× 75 0.8× 20 549
Irene Sánchez-Vera Spain 9 294 1.1× 296 1.6× 103 0.7× 210 1.5× 73 0.8× 9 914
Lila Carniglia Argentina 15 262 1.0× 284 1.5× 186 1.3× 235 1.7× 47 0.5× 24 747
Rachael M. Clarke Ireland 9 494 1.8× 136 0.7× 239 1.7× 160 1.2× 227 2.3× 9 771
Ana Rubio‐Araiz Spain 14 418 1.5× 239 1.3× 200 1.4× 252 1.9× 192 2.0× 14 1.0k
Luca Caracciolo Italy 9 241 0.9× 196 1.1× 195 1.4× 213 1.6× 43 0.4× 10 608
Ju Shi United States 11 264 1.0× 144 0.8× 179 1.3× 238 1.8× 143 1.5× 15 787
Raphael Zinn Australia 7 245 0.9× 186 1.0× 256 1.8× 224 1.6× 47 0.5× 9 619
Julieta Saba Argentina 10 165 0.6× 170 0.9× 110 0.8× 151 1.1× 30 0.3× 14 441
Laura B. Ferguson United States 12 243 0.9× 254 1.4× 160 1.2× 385 2.8× 58 0.6× 19 855

Countries citing papers authored by Rachel E. Nally

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel E. Nally's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel E. Nally with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel E. Nally more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel E. Nally

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel E. Nally. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel E. Nally. The network helps show where Rachel E. Nally may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel E. Nally

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel E. Nally. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel E. Nally based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel E. Nally. Rachel E. Nally is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Gantois, Ilse, Ke Fang, Daniela Babovic, et al.. (2007). Ablation of D1 dopamine receptor-expressing cells generates mice with seizures, dystonia, hyperactivity, and impaired oral behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 104(10). 4182–4187. 54 indexed citations
2.
Clarke, Rachael M., et al.. (2006). Interaction between interferon γ and insulin‐like growth factor‐1 in hippocampus impacts on the ability of rats to sustain long‐term potentiation. Journal of Neurochemistry. 96(6). 1560–1571. 70 indexed citations
3.
Griffin, Rebecca J., et al.. (2006). The age‐related attenuation in long‐term potentiation is associated with microglial activation. Journal of Neurochemistry. 99(4). 1263–1272. 239 indexed citations
4.
Lynch, Aileen, David J. Loane, Aedín M. Minogue, et al.. (2006). Eicosapentaenoic acid confers neuroprotection in the amyloid-β challenged aged hippocampus. Neurobiology of Aging. 28(6). 845–855. 125 indexed citations
5.
Tomiyama, Katsunori, Hiroshi Yamamoto, Gerard J. O’Sullivan, et al.. (2006). Disruption of orofacial movement topographies in congenic mutants with dopamine D5 but not D4 receptor or DARPP-32 transduction ‘knockout’. European Neuropsychopharmacology. 16(6). 437–445. 10 indexed citations
7.
Nally, Rachel E., Fergal N McNamara, Jeremiah J. Clifford, et al.. (2003). Topographical Assessment of Ethological and Dopamine Receptor Agonist-Induced Behavioral Phenotype in Mutants with Congenic DARPP-32 ‘Knockout’. Neuropsychopharmacology. 28(12). 2055–2063. 24 indexed citations
8.
Harkin, Andrew, Rachel E. Nally, John Kelly, & B. E. Leonard. (2000). Effects of reboxetine and sertraline treatments alone and in combination on the binding properties of cortical NMDA and β1-adrenergic receptors in an animal model of depression. Journal of Neural Transmission. 107(10). 1213–1227. 17 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026