Rachel Chin
- Toxicology top 1%
- Emergency Medicine top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience
- Clinical Psychology
- Pharmacology
- Co-authors
- Karl A. SporerJo Ellen DyerThomas D. WuGus M. GarmelRicardo MartínezLawrence LamGlen YangJeffrey Tabas
- Topics
- Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers)French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers)Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaACS NanoAcademic Medicine
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Rachel Chin
19 papers receiving 352 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Toxicology 176
- Emergency Medicine 81
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 74
- Clinical Psychology 63
- Pharmacology 53
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel Chin
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel Chin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel Chin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel Chin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel Chin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel Chin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel Chin. The network helps show where Rachel Chin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel Chin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel Chin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel Chin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel Chin. Rachel Chin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 12 | |
| 8 | Teratology and Developmental Pharmacology: Why Should Paediatricians Care? | 2 |
| 9 | High expression levels of IKK alpha and IKK beta are necessary for the malignant properties of liver cancer | 3 |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | Cancer incidence and mortality from four cancer registries in Zhejiang Province in 2005 | 1 |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | Salicylate Toxicity from Ingestionand Continued Dermal Absorption | 6 |
| 14 | 50 | |
| 15 | A retrospective review comparing the use of Gonal-F and Metrodin-HP for in-vitro fertilisation (IVF). | 1 |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 6 | |
| 18 | 174 | |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | 28 |
About Rachel Chin
Rachel Chin is a scholar working on Toxicology, Family Practice and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 24 papers that have together received 380 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Patient Safety and Medication Errors (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers) and Pain Management and Opioid Use (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Toxicology (176 citations), Emergency Medicine (81 citations) and Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (74 citations). Rachel Chin has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Karl A. Sporer, Jo Ellen Dyer, Thomas D. Wu, Gus M. Garmel, Ricardo Martínez, Lawrence Lam, Glen Yang, Jeffrey Tabas, Susan B. Promes and Daniel Garza. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, ACS Nano and Academic Medicine.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.