Rachel C. Voss
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences top 2%
- Plant Science
- Economics and Econometrics
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Soil Science
- Co-authors
- Pieter RutsaertJill E. CairnsJason DonovanCosmos MagorokoshoThokozile NdhlelaJordan ChamberlinCarol ShennanKai Sonder
- Topics
- Agricultural Innovations and Practices (10 papers)Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers)Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers)
- Cited by
- General Agricultural and Biological SciencesBusiness and International ManagementSoil Science
- Partner nations
- KenyaUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Rachel C. Voss
10 papers receiving 260 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- General Agricultural and Biological Sciences 100
- Plant Science 92
- Economics and Econometrics 53
- Agronomy and Crop Science 42
- Soil Science 40
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel C. Voss
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel C. Voss's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel C. Voss with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel C. Voss more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel C. Voss
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel C. Voss. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel C. Voss. The network helps show where Rachel C. Voss may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel C. Voss
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel C. Voss. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel C. Voss based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel C. Voss. Rachel C. Voss is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 3 | |
| 5 | 6 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 97 | |
| 8 | 29 | |
| 9 | 59 | |
| 10 | 12 | |
| 11 | 37 | |
| 12 | Sustaining Rural Livelihoods Amid Changing Agrarian Landscapes in Senegal | 0 |
| 13 | 12 |
About Rachel C. Voss
Rachel C. Voss is a scholar working on General Agricultural and Biological Sciences, Business and International Management and Soil Science, having authored 13 papers that have together received 265 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Agricultural Innovations and Practices (10 papers), Agriculture, Land Use, Rural Development (4 papers) and Agricultural risk and resilience (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Agricultural and Biological Sciences (100 citations), Business and International Management (14 citations) and Soil Science (40 citations). Rachel C. Voss has collaborated with scholars based in Kenya, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Pieter Rutsaert, Jill E. Cairns, Jason Donovan, Cosmos Magorokosho, Thokozile Ndhlela, Jordan Chamberlin, Carol Shennan, Kai Sonder, Bram Govaerts and Sieglinde S. Snapp. Their work appears in journals such as World Development, Agricultural Systems and Journal of Cereal Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.