Rachel C. Bourne
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Stephen J. GambleMichael G. StewartJohn L. WaddingtonA.J. CrossAndrás CsillagEve C. JohnstoneF. OwenP.L.A. Gabbott
- Topics
- Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers)Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomHungaryPoland
In The Last Decade
Rachel C. Bourne
39 papers receiving 1.1k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 627
- Cognitive Neuroscience 282
- Psychiatry and Mental health 275
- Molecular Biology 262
- Social Psychology 129
Countries citing papers authored by Rachel C. Bourne
This map shows the geographic impact of Rachel C. Bourne's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Rachel C. Bourne with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Rachel C. Bourne more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Rachel C. Bourne
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Rachel C. Bourne. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Rachel C. Bourne. The network helps show where Rachel C. Bourne may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Rachel C. Bourne
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Rachel C. Bourne. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Rachel C. Bourne based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Rachel C. Bourne. Rachel C. Bourne is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 40 | |
| 2 | 21 | |
| 3 | 23 | |
| 4 | 9 | |
| 5 | 18 | |
| 6 | 26 | |
| 7 | 24 | |
| 8 | 70 | |
| 9 | 20 | |
| 10 | 38 | |
| 11 | 10 | |
| 12 | 15 | |
| 13 | 20 | |
| 14 | 30 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 9 | |
| 17 | 1 | |
| 18 | A simple radioimmunoassay for plasma diazepam and its application to single dose studies in man | 3 |
| 19 | A simple radioimmunoassay for plasma diazepam and its application to single dose studies in man [proceedings]. | 2 |
| 20 | Failure to detect anti-group-specific murine leukemia virus activity in tetraparental AKR-CBA chimeras. | 5 |
About Rachel C. Bourne
Rachel C. Bourne is a scholar working on Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience, Biological Psychiatry and Sensory Systems, having authored 39 papers that have together received 1.1k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research (18 papers), Neural dynamics and brain function (6 papers) and Animal Nutrition and Physiology (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (627 citations), Biological Psychiatry (64 citations) and Developmental Biology (53 citations). Rachel C. Bourne has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Hungary and Poland. Frequent co-authors include Stephen J. Gamble, Michael G. Stewart, John L. Waddington, Michael G. Stewart, A.J. Cross, András Csillag, Eve C. Johnstone, F. Owen, P.L.A. Gabbott and Timothy J. Crow. Their work appears in journals such as Science, The Journal of Comparative Neurology and Brain Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.