R. W. Clay
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Environmental Engineering top 10%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Co-authors
- B. R. DawsonP. R. GerhardyR. J. ProtheroeAbdullrahman MaghrabiG. ThorntonN. WildHuade GuanJames Jones
- Topics
- Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (93 papers)Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (49 papers)Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (19 papers)
- Partner nations
- AustraliaSaudi ArabiaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. W. Clay
117 papers receiving 939 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 88
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 655
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 446
- Environmental Engineering 121
- Atmospheric Science 114
- Global and Planetary Change 112
Countries citing papers authored by R. W. Clay
This map shows the geographic impact of R. W. Clay's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. W. Clay with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. W. Clay more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. W. Clay
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. W. Clay. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. W. Clay. The network helps show where R. W. Clay may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. W. Clay
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. W. Clay. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. W. Clay based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. W. Clay. R. W. Clay is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 100 Years of Cosmic Rays - An Australian Perspective: Part 3 | 1 |
| 4 | CANGAROO-III search for TeV gamma-rays from two clusters of galaxies | 10 |
| 5 | Data acquisition system of the CANGAROO-III telescope | 1 |
| 6 | 34 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | Adelaide Design Workshop on Techniques for the Study of Cosmic Rays with Energies Above 1019eV | 3 |
| 11 | 0 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 3 | |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 5 | |
| 17 | Temporal Characteristics of Air Shower Energy Deposition in Plastic Scintillators | 0 |
| 18 | Cerenkov Light from EAS at Sea-Level | 1 |
| 19 | Improved Wideband Scattering Analysis. | 1 |
| 20 | 9 |
About R. W. Clay
R. W. Clay is a scholar working on Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Radiation, having authored 133 papers that have together received 984 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Astrophysics and Cosmic Phenomena (93 papers), Dark Matter and Cosmic Phenomena (49 papers) and Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae (19 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nuclear and High Energy Physics (655 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (446 citations) and Environmental Engineering (121 citations). R. W. Clay has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, Saudi Arabia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include B. R. Dawson, P. R. Gerhardy, R. J. Protheroe, Abdullrahman Maghrabi, G. Thornton, R. J. Protheroe, N. Wild, Huade Guan, James Jones and J. McL. Bennett. Their work appears in journals such as Nature, Physical Review Letters and Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.