R. van Peer

1.4k total citations · 1 hit paper
7 papers, 825 citations indexed

About

R. van Peer is a scholar working on Plant Science, Cell Biology and Molecular Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. van Peer has authored 7 papers receiving a total of 825 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Plant Science, 2 papers in Cell Biology and 1 paper in Molecular Biology. Recurrent topics in R. van Peer's work include Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (6 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). R. van Peer is often cited by papers focused on Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity (6 papers), Legume Nitrogen Fixing Symbiosis (3 papers) and Plant Pathogens and Fungal Diseases (2 papers). R. van Peer collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, Malawi and United States. R. van Peer's co-authors include B. Schippers, Peter A. H. M. Bakker, Letty A. de Weger, A. W. Bakker, Karl W. Verhoeff, Mats Leeman, G. W. van Eijk and D. Hornby and has published in prestigious journals such as Applied and Environmental Microbiology, Plant and Soil and Phytopathology.

In The Last Decade

R. van Peer

7 papers receiving 711 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Induced Resistance and Phytoalexin Accumulation in Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt of Carnation byPseudomonassp. Strain WCS417r

1991 488 citations R. van Peer Phytopathology profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R. van Peer Netherlands	6	786	202	132	26	25	7	825
Shigehito Takenaka Japan	14	579 0.7×	187 0.9×	92 0.7×	22 0.8×	26 1.0×	35	622
Ruth Guetsky United States	5	517 0.7×	252 1.2×	83 0.6×	19 0.7×	46 1.8×	6	565
M. Aragaki United States	12	404 0.5×	253 1.3×	127 1.0×	12 0.5×	51 2.0×	58	444
G. Musson United States	5	372 0.5×	140 0.7×	74 0.6×	15 0.6×	16 0.6×	7	415
Witold Irzykowski Poland	12	374 0.5×	147 0.7×	120 0.9×	17 0.7×	44 1.8×	23	421
António de Goes Brazil	12	506 0.6×	333 1.6×	121 0.9×	22 0.8×	44 1.8×	45	558
Abhinandan Deora Canada	13	629 0.8×	94 0.5×	150 1.1×	45 1.7×	21 0.8×	24	705
Udi Landau Israel	8	670 0.9×	103 0.5×	261 2.0×	19 0.7×	22 0.9×	8	727
G. L. Mark Ireland	7	436 0.6×	67 0.3×	90 0.7×	63 2.4×	14 0.6×	7	488
Cecilia Inés Mónaco Argentina	13	531 0.7×	302 1.5×	100 0.8×	14 0.5×	60 2.4×	58	600

Countries citing papers authored by R. van Peer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. van Peer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. van Peer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. van Peer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. van Peer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. van Peer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. van Peer. The network helps show where R. van Peer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. van Peer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. van Peer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. van Peer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. van Peer. R. van Peer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

7 of 7 papers shown

1.

Peer, R. van. (1991). Induced Resistance and Phytoalexin Accumulation in Biological Control of Fusarium Wilt of Carnation byPseudomonassp. Strain WCS417r. Phytopathology. 81(7). 728–728. 488 indexed citations breakdown →

2.

Schippers, B., A. W. Bakker, Peter A. H. M. Bakker, & R. van Peer. (1990). Beneficial and deleterious effects of HCN-producing pseudomonads on rhizosphere interactions. Plant and Soil. 129(1). 75–83. 83 indexed citations

3.

Peer, R. van, et al.. (1990). Characterization of Root Surface and Endorhizosphere Pseudomonads in Relation to Their Colonization of Roots. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 56(8). 2462–2470. 98 indexed citations

4.

Bakker, Peter A. H. M., R. van Peer, B. Schippers, & D. Hornby. (1990). Specificity of siderophores and siderophore receptors and biocontrol by Pseudomonas spp.. 131–142. 21 indexed citations

5.

Peer, R. van, et al.. (1989). Response of pondcypress growth rates to sewage effluent application. Wetlands Ecology and Management. 1(1). 13–20. 3 indexed citations

6.

Peer, R. van & B. Schippers. (1989). Plant growth responses to bacterization with selected Pseudomonas spp. strains and rhizosphere microbial development in hydroponic cultures. Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 35(4). 456–463. 87 indexed citations

7.

Verhoeff, Karl W., et al.. (1988). Changes in pH and the Production of Organic Acids During Colonization of Tomato Petioles by Botrytis cinerea. Journal of Phytopathology. 122(4). 327–336. 45 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact