R. V. Fodor
- Geophysics top 1%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 5%
- Artificial Intelligence top 5%
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 5%
- Atmospheric Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Klaus KeilG. R. BauerAlcídes N. SialScott K. VetterT. E. BunchEdwin H. McKeeG. DobosiSamuel B. Mukasa
- Topics
- Geological and Geochemical Analysis (56 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (24 papers)Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (21 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesBrazilFrance
In The Last Decade
R. V. Fodor
75 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Geophysics 1.3k
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 356
- Artificial Intelligence 352
- Geochemistry and Petrology 182
- Atmospheric Science 149
Countries citing papers authored by R. V. Fodor
This map shows the geographic impact of R. V. Fodor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. V. Fodor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. V. Fodor more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. V. Fodor
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. V. Fodor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. V. Fodor. The network helps show where R. V. Fodor may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. V. Fodor
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. V. Fodor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. V. Fodor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. V. Fodor. R. V. Fodor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 4 | |
| 3 | Depleted rejuvenated-stage source component in Hawaiian shield-stage lavas | 1 |
| 4 | 35 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 27 | |
| 8 | 20 | |
| 9 | Parana Basin Lavas: Chemical and Petrographic Characteristics | 1 |
| 10 | 42 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 68 | |
| 13 | 8 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | The Shaw meteorite: Evidence for an igneous origin | 1 |
| 16 | Parent material for seemingly-exotic, light-colored lithic fragments in LL-group chondrites | 2 |
| 17 | A chondrite with a regolith fragment containing non-chondritic material | 4 |
| 18 | Carbonaceous and non-carbonaceous lithic inclusions in the Plainview, Texas, chondrite. | 5 |
| 19 | Composition and origin of lithic fragments in L- and H-group chondrites. | 15 |
| 20 | Tremolite With High Richterite-Molecule Content in Kimberlite From Buell Park, Arizona | 12 |
About R. V. Fodor
R. V. Fodor is a scholar working on Geophysics, Geochemistry and Petrology and Geology, having authored 77 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geochemical Analysis (56 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (24 papers) and Geochemistry and Geologic Mapping (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (1.3k citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (182 citations) and Astronomy and Astrophysics (356 citations). R. V. Fodor has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Brazil and France. Frequent co-authors include Klaus Keil, G. R. Bauer, Alcídes N. Sial, Scott K. Vetter, T. E. Bunch, Edwin H. McKee, G. Dobosi, Samuel B. Mukasa, Frederick A. Frey and B. B. Hanan. Their work appears in journals such as Science, Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres and Analytical Chemistry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.