R. T. Mullins
- Philosophy top 2%
- Religious studies top 2%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology
- Social Psychology
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Nicole von SteinbüchelJohn W. BeasleyHartmut SchmidtStephan SehmischA. Joy RiveraWolfgang DeinsbergerK. M. StürmerHenning Gibbons
- Topics
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil (25 papers)Karl Barth and Christian Theology (9 papers)Augustinian Studies and Theology (4 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesFinland
In The Last Decade
R. T. Mullins
26 papers receiving 166 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 31
- Philosophy 153
- Religious studies 45
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 44
- Social Psychology 22
- Sociology and Political Science 18
Countries citing papers authored by R. T. Mullins
This map shows the geographic impact of R. T. Mullins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. T. Mullins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. T. Mullins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. T. Mullins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. T. Mullins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. T. Mullins. The network helps show where R. T. Mullins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. T. Mullins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. T. Mullins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. T. Mullins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. T. Mullins. R. T. Mullins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 23 | |
| 10 | 1 | |
| 11 | 5 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 6 | |
| 14 | Panentheism is Still Vague: A Reply to Lataster and Bilimoria | 0 |
| 15 | 7 | |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 9 | |
| 18 | 7 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | Time and the everlasting God | 2 |
About R. T. Mullins
R. T. Mullins is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 31 papers that have together received 199 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (25 papers), Karl Barth and Christian Theology (9 papers) and Augustinian Studies and Theology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (153 citations), Religious studies (45 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (44 citations). R. T. Mullins has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Nicole von Steinbüchel, John W. Beasley, Hartmut Schmidt, Stephan Sehmisch, A. Joy Rivera, Wolfgang Deinsberger, K. M. Stürmer, Henning Gibbons, K. von Wild and Emanuela Sani. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.