R. T. Clarke
- Ecology top 5%
- Nature and Landscape Conservation top 5%
- Global and Planetary Change top 10%
- Environmental Chemistry top 10%
- Water Science and Technology
- Topics
- Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (7 papers)Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (6 papers)Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomAustraliaFinland
In The Last Decade
R. T. Clarke
17 papers receiving 409 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Ecology 282
- Nature and Landscape Conservation 202
- Global and Planetary Change 119
- Environmental Chemistry 91
- Water Science and Technology 61
Countries citing papers authored by R. T. Clarke
This map shows the geographic impact of R. T. Clarke's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. T. Clarke with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. T. Clarke more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. T. Clarke
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. T. Clarke. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. T. Clarke. The network helps show where R. T. Clarke may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. T. Clarke
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. T. Clarke. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. T. Clarke based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. T. Clarke. R. T. Clarke is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | Biological quality of lakes: Phase II: Quantifying uncertainty associated withmacroinvertebrate sampling methods for lake benthos | 1 |
| 3 | 46 | |
| 4 | Methodology of Countryside Survey 2000 Module 1: Survey of Broad Habitats and Landscape Features: Final Report | 2 |
| 5 | Countryside Survey 2000 Module 7. Land Cover Map 2000. Final Report | 28 |
| 6 | 6 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 42 | |
| 9 | Uncertainty in estimates of biological quality based on RIVPACS. | 24 |
| 10 | 120 | |
| 11 | 78 | |
| 12 | Biological assessment methods: controlling the quality of biological data. Package 1: The variability of data used for assessing the biological condition of rivers | 2 |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | Countryside Survey 1990: main report. (Countryside 1990 vol.2) | 16 |
| 15 | 9 | |
| 16 | 45 | |
| 17 | 7 | |
| 18 | 26 |
About R. T. Clarke
R. T. Clarke is a scholar working on Ecology, Nature and Landscape Conservation and Water Science and Technology, having authored 18 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Freshwater macroinvertebrate diversity and ecology (7 papers), Aquatic Invertebrate Ecology and Behavior (6 papers) and Fish Ecology and Management Studies (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Nature and Landscape Conservation (202 citations), Ecology (282 citations) and Ecological Modeling (43 citations). R. T. Clarke has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include D.C. Howard, Colin Barr, R. G. H. Bunce, Andrew M. Lane, John Murphy, M.T. Furse, J F Wright, D. Moss, A. F. H. Marker and R Saxén. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Environmental Management, Freshwater Biology and Hydrology and earth system sciences.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.