R. Schäfer
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- General Psychology top 5%
- Philosophy top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Atmospheric Science
- Topics
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers)Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (1 paper)Tree-ring climate responses (1 paper)
- Journals
- Climate ResearchPubMed
- Partner nations
- GermanyGreeceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. Schäfer
12 papers receiving 140 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 54
- Clinical Psychology 131
- General Psychology 43
- Philosophy 32
- Social Psychology 27
- Atmospheric Science 24
Countries citing papers authored by R. Schäfer
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Schäfer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Schäfer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Schäfer more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Schäfer
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Schäfer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Schäfer. The network helps show where R. Schäfer may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Schäfer
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Schäfer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Schäfer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Schäfer. R. Schäfer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 29 | |
| 2 | A study of thought processes in a word association test. | 0 |
| 3 | [Dietary fiber in the therapy of constipation]. | 2 |
| 4 | Vicissitudes of remembering in the countertransference. Fervent failure, colonisation and remembering otherwise. | 9 |
| 5 | [Psychosocial factors in Crohn disease--an overview]. | 3 |
| 6 | One perspective on the Freud-Klein controversies 1941-45. | 2 |
| 7 | The conceptualisation of clinical facts. | 5 |
| 8 | Two discussions of 'Theory in vivo' by Dennis Duncan. | 0 |
| 9 | [Technical aspects in the Pari provocation test I]. | 3 |
| 10 | The search for common ground. | 28 |
| 11 | Psychoanalysis without psychodynamics. | 31 |
| 12 | Talking to patients in psychotherapy. | 8 |
| 13 | The psychoanalytic vision of reality. | 59 |
| 14 | The mechanisms of defence. | 28 |
About R. Schäfer
R. Schäfer is a scholar working on Complementary and Manual Therapy, Clinical Psychology and Gastroenterology, having authored 14 papers that have together received 207 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications (4 papers), Transactional Analysis in Psychotherapy (1 paper) and Tree-ring climate responses (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Psychology (43 citations), Clinical Psychology (131 citations) and Philosophy (32 citations). R. Schäfer has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, Greece and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Jürg Luterbacher, Rainer Schreg, J. Werner, Ulf Büntgen, Jan Esper and Paul Enck. Their work appears in journals such as Climate Research and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.