R. Moeller

1.1k citations
14 papers · 70 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

R. Moeller

13 papers receiving 63 citations

Peers

R. Moeller
Comparison fields: 5 of 32
  • Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality 16
  • Aerospace Engineering 41
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics 21
  • Control and Systems Engineering 18
  • Geology 3
Replace Joan Ervin with:
Joan Ervin United States
Farah Alibay United States
Mark Andraschko United States
Rashied Amini United States
Noah Root United States
Michael Jones United States
Simon Blake United Kingdom
Aaron Cohen United States
M. Bisgaard Denmark
Mark Brumfield United States
R. Moeller relative to Joan Ervin United States Joan Ervin's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Joan Ervin · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by R. Moeller

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Moeller's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Moeller with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Moeller more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Moeller

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Moeller. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Moeller. The network helps show where R. Moeller may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside R. Moeller, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with R. Moeller Line = papers co-authored together R. Moeller links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

14 of 14 papers shown
#Work
1 201321
2 20159
3 20118
4
Identification of mission sensitivities for high-power electric propulsion systems
20057
5 20116
6 20095
7
Reaching the outer planets with nuclear electric propulsion: trades, sensitivities, and the case for a Neptune System Explorer
20034
8 20073
9 20073
10 20241
11 19881
12 19671
13
Influence of Tailored Applied Magnetic Fields on High-Power MPD Thruster Current Transport and Onset-Related Phenomena
20131
14 20080

About R. Moeller

R. Moeller is a scholar working on Aerospace Engineering, Astronomy and Astrophysics, Control and Systems Engineering, Electrical and Electronic Engineering and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 14 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Spacecraft Design and Technology (5 papers), Astro and Planetary Science (5 papers), Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (4 papers), Planetary Science and Exploration (4 papers), Space Exploration and Technology (2 papers), Plasma Diagnostics and Applications (2 papers), Technology Assessment and Management (2 papers) and Advanced Data Storage Technologies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety, Risk, Reliability and Quality (16 citations), Aerospace Engineering (41 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (21 citations), Control and Systems Engineering (18 citations) and Geology (3 citations). R. Moeller has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert Frisbee, Joan Ervin, John Ziemer, W. D. Smythe, Thomas R. Spilker, James E. Polk, M. Noca, Matthew Bennett, Sara Spangelo and Farah Alibay. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Systems Journal, Art Journal, Annales Françaises d Anesthésie et de Réanimation and NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact