R. Michael Burger

1.3k total citations
31 papers, 863 citations indexed

About

R. Michael Burger is a scholar working on Sensory Systems, Cognitive Neuroscience and Developmental Biology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Michael Burger has authored 31 papers receiving a total of 863 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sensory Systems, 14 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 12 papers in Developmental Biology. Recurrent topics in R. Michael Burger's work include Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers). R. Michael Burger is often cited by papers focused on Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics (18 papers), Animal Vocal Communication and Behavior (12 papers) and Neural dynamics and brain function (11 papers). R. Michael Burger collaborates with scholars based in United States, Germany and Japan. R. Michael Burger's co-authors include George D. Pollak, Edwin W. Rubel, A. Klug, Karina S. Cramer, Eric E. Bauer, Thomas J. Park, MacKenzie A. Howard, Benedikt Grothe, Iwao Fukui and Harunori Ohmori and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and The Journal of Physiology.

In The Last Decade

R. Michael Burger

30 papers receiving 849 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Michael Burger United States 17 492 489 246 219 120 31 863
Antje Brand Germany 7 398 0.8× 461 0.9× 166 0.7× 191 0.9× 119 1.0× 8 776
Kendall A. Hutson United States 14 635 1.3× 632 1.3× 330 1.3× 84 0.4× 45 0.4× 24 980
Alexander V. Galazyuk United States 20 634 1.3× 626 1.3× 87 0.4× 150 0.7× 90 0.8× 40 900
Tetsufumi Ito Japan 15 445 0.9× 448 0.9× 306 1.2× 53 0.2× 55 0.5× 50 861
Herbert Voigt United States 18 869 1.8× 862 1.8× 146 0.6× 149 0.7× 161 1.3× 44 1.1k
Amiram Shneiderman United States 13 633 1.3× 393 0.8× 317 1.3× 119 0.5× 42 0.3× 13 891
Matthew W. Spitzer United States 15 317 0.6× 614 1.3× 130 0.5× 194 0.9× 72 0.6× 22 811
Miguel Á. Merchán Spain 16 772 1.6× 743 1.5× 359 1.5× 81 0.4× 44 0.4× 43 1.2k
Joshua X. Gittelman United States 12 262 0.5× 321 0.7× 178 0.7× 115 0.5× 45 0.4× 12 549
Russell F. Huffman United States 8 283 0.6× 288 0.6× 97 0.4× 146 0.7× 128 1.1× 8 541

Countries citing papers authored by R. Michael Burger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Michael Burger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Michael Burger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Michael Burger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Michael Burger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Michael Burger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Michael Burger. The network helps show where R. Michael Burger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Michael Burger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Michael Burger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Michael Burger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Michael Burger. R. Michael Burger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2024). Cholinergic modulation in the vertebrate auditory pathway. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience. 18. 1414484–1414484. 1 indexed citations
2.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2024). Dopamine receptors D1, D2, and D4 modulate electrical synapses and excitability in the thalamic reticular nucleus. Journal of Neurophysiology. 133(2). 374–387.
3.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2023). A Developmental Switch in Cholinergic Mechanisms of Modulation in the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body. Journal of Neuroscience. 44(8). JN–RM. 3 indexed citations
4.
Beebe, Nichole L., et al.. (2020). Endogenous Cholinergic Signaling Modulates Sound-Evoked Responses of the Medial Nucleus of the Trapezoid Body. Journal of Neuroscience. 41(4). 674–688. 6 indexed citations
5.
Ashida, Go, et al.. (2016). Tonotopic Optimization for Temporal Processing in the Cochlear Nucleus. Journal of Neuroscience. 36(32). 8500–8515. 22 indexed citations
6.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2014). Glycinergic transmission modulates GABAergic inhibition in the avian auditory pathway. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 8. 19–19. 5 indexed citations
7.
Keine, Christian, et al.. (2014). Activity-dependent modulation of inhibitory synaptic kinetics in the cochlear nucleus. Frontiers in Neural Circuits. 8. 145–145. 14 indexed citations
8.
Eble, Diane M., et al.. (2012). The Cx43-like Connexin Protein Cx40.8 Is Differentially Localized during Fin Ontogeny and Fin Regeneration. PLoS ONE. 7(2). e31364–e31364. 12 indexed citations
9.
Klug, A., et al.. (2012). Modulation of synaptic input by GABAB receptors improves coincidence detection for computation of sound location. The Journal of Physiology. 590(13). 3047–3066. 26 indexed citations
10.
Fukui, Iwao, R. Michael Burger, Harunori Ohmori, & Edwin W. Rubel. (2010). GABAergic Inhibition Sharpens the Frequency Tuning and Enhances Phase Locking in Chicken Nucleus Magnocellularis Neurons. Journal of Neuroscience. 30(36). 12075–12083. 31 indexed citations
11.
Howard, MacKenzie A., R. Michael Burger, & Edwin W. Rubel. (2007). A Developmental Switch to GABAergic Inhibition Dependent on Increases in Kv1-Type K+Currents. Journal of Neuroscience. 27(8). 2112–2123. 49 indexed citations
12.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2005). Expression of GABAB receptor in the avian auditory brainstem: Ontogeny, afferent deprivation, and ultrastructure. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 489(1). 11–22. 16 indexed citations
13.
Burger, R. Michael, et al.. (2004). Avian superior olivary nucleus provides divergent inhibitory input to parallel auditory pathways. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 481(1). 6–18. 79 indexed citations
14.
Lu, Yong, R. Michael Burger, & Edwin W. Rubel. (2004). GABAB Receptor Activation Modulates GABAA Receptor-Mediated Inhibition in Chicken Nucleus Magnocellularis Neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology. 93(3). 1429–1438. 22 indexed citations
16.
Pollak, George D., R. Michael Burger, & A. Klug. (2002). Dissecting the circuitry of the auditory system. Trends in Neurosciences. 26(1). 33–39. 74 indexed citations
17.
Pollak, George D., R. Michael Burger, Thomas J. Park, A. Klug, & Eric E. Bauer. (2002). Roles of inhibition for transforming binaural properties in the brainstem auditory system. Hearing Research. 168(1-2). 60–78. 55 indexed citations
18.
Klug, A., Asma Khan, R. Michael Burger, et al.. (2000). Latency as a function of intensity in auditory neurons: influences of central processing. Hearing Research. 148(1-2). 107–123. 63 indexed citations
19.
Chokroverty, Sudhansu, W. Hening, David L. Wright, et al.. (1995). Magnetic brain stimulation: safety studies. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology/Electromyography and Motor Control. 97(1). 36–42. 45 indexed citations
20.
Chokroverty, Sudhansu, et al.. (1995). Thoracic spinal nerve and root conduction: A magnetic stimulation study. Muscle & Nerve. 18(9). 987–991. 21 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026