R. M. Satava

1.1k total citations
12 papers, 869 citations indexed

About

R. M. Satava is a scholar working on Surgery, Biomedical Engineering and Pathology and Forensic Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, R. M. Satava has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 869 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 3 papers in Biomedical Engineering and 1 paper in Pathology and Forensic Medicine. Recurrent topics in R. M. Satava's work include Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). R. M. Satava is often cited by papers focused on Surgical Simulation and Training (5 papers), Anatomy and Medical Technology (3 papers) and Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (1 paper). R. M. Satava collaborates with scholars based in United States, Netherlands and Canada. R. M. Satava's co-authors include Anthony G. Gallagher, Vic Velanovich, E. Matthew Ritter, C. D. Smith, Kieran McGlade, Andrew Lederman, P. M. N. Y. H. Go and James C. Rosser and has published in prestigious journals such as Surgical Endoscopy, Surgical Innovation and PubMed.

In The Last Decade

R. M. Satava

12 papers receiving 830 citations

Peers

R. M. Satava

SURGE

BE

EM

PHYSI

CCM

Gunnar Ahlberg Sweden

E. G. G. Verdaasdonk Netherlands

Nancy J. Hogle United States

Elizabeth C. Hamilton United States

Matthew Bridges United Kingdom

N Taffinder United Kingdom

Kent R. Van Sickle United States

Daniel J. Scott United States

C. D. Smith United States

Patricia C. Bergen United States

Gunnar Ahlberg Sweden

R. M. Satava

1.0k ×1.3

SURGE

346 ×0.9

BE

448 ×2.2

EM

227 ×1.4

PHYSI

195 ×1.3

CCM

Citations per year, relative to R. M. Satava R. M. Satava (= 1×) peers Gunnar Ahlberg

Countries citing papers authored by R. M. Satava

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. M. Satava's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. M. Satava with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. M. Satava more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. M. Satava

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. M. Satava. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. M. Satava. The network helps show where R. M. Satava may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. M. Satava

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. M. Satava. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. M. Satava based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. M. Satava. R. M. Satava is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Satava, R. M.. (2006). Looking forward. Surgical Endoscopy. 20(S2). S503–S504. 10 indexed citations

2.

Gallagher, Anthony G., Andrew Lederman, Kieran McGlade, R. M. Satava, & C. D. Smith. (2004). Discriminative validity of the Minimally Invasive Surgical Trainer in Virtual Reality (MIST-VR) using criteria levels based on expert performance. Surgical Endoscopy. 18(4). 660–665. 121 indexed citations

3.

Satava, R. M.. (2004). Future Trends in the Design and Application of Surgical Robots. Surgical Innovation. 11(2). 129–135. 18 indexed citations

4.

Gallagher, Anthony G., E. Matthew Ritter, & R. M. Satava. (2003). Fundamental principles of validation, and reliability: rigorous science for the assessment of surgical education and training. Surgical Endoscopy. 17(10). 1525–1529. 284 indexed citations

5.

Satava, R. M.. (2003). Disruptive visions. Surgical Endoscopy. 17(1). 104–107. 12 indexed citations

6.

Gallagher, Anthony G. & R. M. Satava. (2002). Virtual reality as a metric for the assessment of laparoscopic psychomotor skills. Surgical Endoscopy. 16(12). 1746–1752. 202 indexed citations

7.

Satava, R. M.. (2002). Disruptive visions. Surgical Endoscopy. 16(10). 1403–1408. 17 indexed citations

8.

Satava, R. M.. (2002). Laparoscopic Surgery, Robots, and Surgical Simulation: Moral and Ethical Issues. Surgical Innovation. 9(4). 230–238. 1 indexed citations

9.

Satava, R. M.. (1996). Three-Dimensional Imaging and Image Displays: Surgical Application of Advanced Technologies. Surgical Innovation. 3(3). 193–198. 3 indexed citations

10.

Satava, R. M.. (1996). Virtual endoscopy Diagnosis using 3-D visualization and virtual representation. Surgical Endoscopy. 10(2). 173–174. 5 indexed citations

11.

Go, P. M. N. Y. H., et al.. (1996). Teleconferencing bridges two oceans and shrinks the surgical world. Surgical Endoscopy. 10(2). 105–106. 2 indexed citations

12.

Velanovich, Vic & R. M. Satava. (1992). Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance.. PubMed. 58(4). 264–9. 194 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact