Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Seismic Images of Crust and Upper Mantle Beneath Tibet: Evidence for Eurasian Plate Subduction
2002569 citationsR. Kind, Xiaohui Yuan et al.profile →
The boundary between the Indian and Asian tectonic plates below Tibet
2010384 citationsXiaohui Yuan, Prakash Kumar et al.profile →
Author Peers
Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields.
citations ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Kind's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Kind with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Kind more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Kind. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Kind. The network helps show where R. Kind may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Kind
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Kind.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Kind based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Kind. R. Kind is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Carbonell, R., A. Levander, & R. Kind. (2013). The Moho Discontinuity Beneath the Continental Crust. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences).1 indexed citations
Heit, Benjamín, Xiaohui Yuan, R. Kind, et al.. (2010). Receiver function results from the PUDEL (PUna DELamination) Seismic Array in the Southern Puna plateau. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 14192.1 indexed citations
9.
Kind, R., R. Meißner, Zhenhan Wu, et al.. (2007). Three-component Seismic Observations Within the INDEPTH IV Transect: NE Tibetan Plateau to Qaidam Basin. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2007.1 indexed citations
Kind, R., Joachim Saul, Douglas Nelson, et al.. (2003). Comprehensive seismic images of the crust and upper mantle beneath Tibet. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 3179.5 indexed citations
13.
Kind, R., et al.. (2003). Rejuvenation of the Lithosphere by the Hawaiian Plume. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2003.3 indexed citations
14.
Kind, R., G. Bock, A. Vafidis, et al.. (2003). Receiver Function Study of the Hellenic Subduction Zone. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2003.6 indexed citations
Alinaghi, A., R. Kind, & F. Sodoudi. (2002). Receiver function probing of the crust in northern Iran. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2002.1 indexed citations
17.
Kind, R., et al.. (2001). Seismic Detection of Narrow Oceanic Plumes and Relation to Mantle Transition Zone Temperature. Publication Database GFZ (GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences). 2001.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.