Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Fractures of the Acetabulum
1993553 citationsEmile Letournel, R JudetPubMedprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R Judet's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R Judet with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R Judet more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R Judet. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R Judet. The network helps show where R Judet may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R Judet
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R Judet.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R Judet based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R Judet. R Judet is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Richard, A, et al.. (2003). [Reconstruction of the humerus with acrylic prosthesis with special reference to fractures-luxations].. PubMed. 68(8-9). 537–47.3 indexed citations
Judet, R, et al.. (1974). Raideur post-traumatique de la cheville.2 indexed citations
6.
Judet, R, et al.. (1973). [Treatment of pseudarthrosis of the carpal scaphoid by pediculated graft].. PubMed. 58(7). 699–705.11 indexed citations
7.
Judet, R, et al.. (1969). Reaction of benzeneselenol with tri- and tetrachloroethylenes under conditions of phase-transfer catalysis. PubMed. 77(45). 1597–600.2 indexed citations
8.
Judet, R. (1968). [Osteo-articular decortication].. PubMed. 42(8). 559–62.1 indexed citations
9.
Judet, R, et al.. (1968). [3 approaches to the upper part of the humerus and the humeral diaphysis].. PubMed. 76(41). 1961–3.8 indexed citations
10.
Judet, R, et al.. (1968). [Fractures of the acetabulum. Classification and guiding rules for open reduction].. PubMed. 81(3). 119–58.20 indexed citations
11.
Judet, J & R Judet. (1968). [Early infection in leg fractures].. PubMed. 54(2). 99–100.1 indexed citations
12.
Judet, J, R Judet, & Emile Letournel. (1967). Un procédé d'ostéosynthèse pour fracture multifragmentaire du pilon tibial.. 93(17).1 indexed citations
13.
Judet, R. (1967). [Arthroplasty of the hip "monobloc" total prosthesis].. PubMed. 93(24). 776–9.1 indexed citations
Judet, R, et al.. (1966). [Trial of experimental revascularization of the femoral head].. PubMed. 52(3). 277–303.8 indexed citations
16.
Judet, R. (1964). TRAITEMENT CHIRURGICAL DES FRACTURES DE L'OMOPLATE.. Acta Orthopaedica Belgica. 30.13 indexed citations
17.
Judet, R, et al.. (1962). [Patelloplasty with preserved skin].. PubMed. 70. 983–6.
18.
Judet, J, J. L. Lagrange, & R Judet. (1958). Les Fractures des membres chez l'enfant.9 indexed citations
19.
Judet, R, J Judet, & J. L. Lagrange. (1958). [Gibson's postero-external approach without section of the trochanter in surgery of femur neck fractures and in osteotomies].. PubMed. 66(13). 263–4.4 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.