Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citations per year, relative to R. J. Kauth R. J. Kauth (= 1×)
peers
R. C. Cicone
Countries citing papers authored by R. J. Kauth
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. J. Kauth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. J. Kauth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. J. Kauth more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. J. Kauth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. J. Kauth. The network helps show where R. J. Kauth may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. J. Kauth
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. J. Kauth.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. J. Kauth based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. J. Kauth. R. J. Kauth is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Crist, E. P. & R. J. Kauth. (1986). The Tasseled Cap de-mystified. Photogrammetric Engineering & Remote Sensing. 52. 81–86.242 indexed citations
2.
Crist, E. P. & R. J. Kauth. (1986). The Tasseled Cap de-mystified. [transformations of MSS and TM data]. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).8 indexed citations
3.
Crist, E. P., et al.. (1984). Investigations of vegetation and soils information contained in LANDSAT Thematic Mapper and Multispectral Scanner data. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).9 indexed citations
4.
Kauth, R. J., et al.. (1979). Feature extraction applied to agricultural crops as seen by LANDSAT. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).53 indexed citations
5.
Horváth, Rita, et al.. (1979). Development of LANDSAT-based technology for crop inventories. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).2 indexed citations
6.
Kauth, R. J., et al.. (1978). Data screening and preprocessing for Landsat MSS data. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).10 indexed citations
7.
Kauth, R. J., Alex Pentland, & Gabriel Thomas. (1977). Blob - An unsupervised clustering approach to spatial preprocessing of MSS imagery. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).21 indexed citations
8.
Nalepka, R. F., R. J. Kauth, & W. Richardson. (1977). Procedure B: A multisegment training selection and proportion estimation procedure for processing LANDSAT agricultural data. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).3 indexed citations
9.
Nalepka, R. F., R. J. Kauth, & G. Thomas. (1976). System for analysis of LANDSAT agricultural data: Automatic computer-assisted proportion estimation of local areas. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).3 indexed citations
Kauth, R. J., et al.. (1971). Atmospheric effects on infrared multispectral sensing of sea-surface temperature from space. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).5 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.