Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management
This map shows the geographic impact of R Griffith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R Griffith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R Griffith more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R Griffith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R Griffith. The network helps show where R Griffith may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R Griffith
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R Griffith.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R Griffith based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R Griffith. R Griffith is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lockwood, Michael, Julie Davidson, Allan Curtis, Elaine Stratford, & R Griffith. (2010). Governance Principles for Natural Resource Management. Society & Natural Resources. 23(10). 986–1001.409 indexed citations breakdown →
4.
Griffith, R & Michael Mitchell. (2010). Building a framework for transformative action in the Wakool Shire (Transformation for resilient landscapes and communities project Working Paper 1). Charles Sturt University Research Output (CRO).5 indexed citations
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2008). Status and good practice in Australian NRM governance. Report No.5, Pathways to good practice in regional NRM governance. Open Access Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
9.
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2008). Governance Standard and Assessment Framework for Australian Natural Resource Management. Report No. 7 of the Project 'Pathways to good practice in regional NRM governance'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).2 indexed citations
10.
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2007). NRM Governance in Australia: NRM Programs and Governance Structures. Report No. 2 of the Project 'Pathways to good practice in regional NRM governance'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).1 indexed citations
11.
Stratford, Elaine, et al.. (2007). Sustainable Development and Good Governance: The 'Big Ideas' Influencing Australian NRM. Report No. 3 of the Project 'Pathways to good practice in regional NRM governance'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).5 indexed citations
12.
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2007). Strengths and challenges of regional NRM governance: interviews with key players and insights from the literature. Report No. 4, Pathways togood practice in regional NRM governance.3 indexed citations
13.
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2007). Strengths and Challenges of Regional NRM Governance: Interviews with Key Players and Insights from the Literature. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).6 indexed citations
14.
Lockwood, Michael, et al.. (2006). Governance Principles for Regional Natural Resource Management. Report No. 1 of the Project 'Pathways to good practice in regional NRM governance'. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).12 indexed citations
15.
Griffith, R. (1978). The major coconut pests and diseases of Trinidad and Tobago and Latin America.. 78(4). 362–383.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.