Jen Dyer

1.2k total citations
18 papers, 856 citations indexed

About

Jen Dyer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and Global and Planetary Change. According to data from OpenAlex, Jen Dyer has authored 18 papers receiving a total of 856 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 6 papers in Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics and 6 papers in Global and Planetary Change. Recurrent topics in Jen Dyer's work include Climate change impacts on agriculture (6 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (4 papers). Jen Dyer is often cited by papers focused on Climate change impacts on agriculture (6 papers), Agricultural Innovations and Practices (4 papers) and Sustainability and Climate Change Governance (4 papers). Jen Dyer collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Zambia and Malawi. Jen Dyer's co-authors include Andrew J. Dougill, Lindsay C. Stringer, David Mkwambisi, Julia Leventon, Chasca Twyman, Mark S. Reed, Felix Kanungwe Kalaba, Evan Fraser, Susannah M. Sallu and Nnyaladzi Batisani and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Environmental Management.

In The Last Decade

Jen Dyer

18 papers receiving 795 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Jen Dyer United Kingdom 13 332 326 184 167 158 18 856
Donovan Campbell Jamaica 16 286 0.9× 205 0.6× 164 0.9× 149 0.9× 127 0.8× 31 779
Amy Quandt United States 15 280 0.8× 384 1.2× 188 1.0× 216 1.3× 125 0.8× 46 1.0k
Kelli M. Archie New Zealand 11 336 1.0× 346 1.1× 269 1.5× 74 0.4× 134 0.8× 14 839
David Mkwambisi Malawi 16 367 1.1× 447 1.4× 212 1.2× 243 1.5× 144 0.9× 34 1.1k
Doan Nainggolan Denmark 13 339 1.0× 155 0.5× 122 0.7× 143 0.9× 147 0.9× 31 854
Chandra Sekhar Bahinipati India 16 287 0.9× 419 1.3× 322 1.8× 188 1.1× 86 0.5× 43 908
Eva Ludi United Kingdom 14 352 1.1× 212 0.7× 259 1.4× 99 0.6× 189 1.2× 32 1.1k
Guro Aandahl India 5 337 1.0× 513 1.6× 377 2.0× 111 0.7× 100 0.6× 6 977
Morey Burnham United States 18 475 1.4× 261 0.8× 298 1.6× 170 1.0× 184 1.2× 48 1.2k
Stephan Barg Canada 5 375 1.1× 504 1.5× 391 2.1× 113 0.7× 161 1.0× 9 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by Jen Dyer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Jen Dyer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jen Dyer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jen Dyer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Jen Dyer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jen Dyer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jen Dyer. The network helps show where Jen Dyer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Jen Dyer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Jen Dyer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Jen Dyer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Jen Dyer. Jen Dyer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

18 of 18 papers shown
1.
Dyer, Jen & Rachel Sandford. (2023). ‘Just Another Outing in a Boat’: Findings from the Evaluation of the Mixed Ability Sport Development Programme. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 3(3). 335–351. 3 indexed citations
2.
Wilson, Caroline, et al.. (2021). Identifying opportunities and gaps in current evaluation frameworks – the knowns and unknowns in determining effective student engagement activity. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 47(6). 843–856. 4 indexed citations
3.
Dyer, Jen, et al.. (2021). Towards just and inclusive community sustainability initiatives: learning from the Mixed Ability movement. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 1 indexed citations
4.
Dyer, Jen, et al.. (2018). Field trips, friendships and societies: Exploring student engagement in the School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 2(1). 30–54. 3 indexed citations
5.
Dyer, Jen, et al.. (2017). A New Model for Inclusive Sports? An Evaluation of Participants’ Experiences of Mixed Ability Rugby. Social Inclusion. 5(2). 130–140. 28 indexed citations
6.
Whitfield, Stephen, Andrew J. Dougill, Jen Dyer, et al.. (2015). Critical reflection on knowledge and narratives of conservation agriculture. Geoforum. 60. 133–142. 51 indexed citations
7.
Leventon, Julia, et al.. (2015). The private sector in climate governance: opportunities for climate compatible development through multilevel industry-government engagement. Journal of Cleaner Production. 102. 316–323. 26 indexed citations
8.
Dyer, Jen, Lindsay C. Stringer, Andrew J. Dougill, et al.. (2014). Assessing participatory practices in community-based natural resource management: Experiences in community engagement from southern Africa. Journal of Environmental Management. 137. 137–145. 131 indexed citations
9.
Leventon, Julia, Felix Kanungwe Kalaba, Jen Dyer, Lindsay C. Stringer, & Andrew J. Dougill. (2014). Delivering community benefits through REDD+: Lessons from Joint Forest Management in Zambia. Forest Policy and Economics. 44. 10–17. 32 indexed citations
10.
Alstine, James Van, et al.. (2014). The governance of hydrocarbons in Uganda: creating opportunities for multi-stakeholder engagement. White Rose Research Online (University of Leeds, The University of Sheffield, University of York). 4 indexed citations
11.
Simelton, Elisabeth, Claire H. Quinn, Nnyaladzi Batisani, et al.. (2013). Is rainfall really changing? Farmers’ perceptions, meteorological data, and policy implications. Climate and Development. 5(2). 123–138. 167 indexed citations
12.
Tompkins, Emma L., Adelina Mensah, Lesley King, et al.. (2013). An investigation of the evidence of benefits from climate compatible development. ePrints Soton (University of Southampton). 17 indexed citations
13.
Stringer, Lindsay C., Andrew J. Dougill, Jen Dyer, et al.. (2013). Advancing climate compatible development: lessons from southern Africa. Regional Environmental Change. 14(2). 713–725. 47 indexed citations
14.
Dyer, Jen, et al.. (2013). Partnership Models for Climate Compatible Development: Experiences from Zambia. Resources. 2(1). 1–25. 29 indexed citations
15.
Stringer, Lindsay C., et al.. (2012). Challenges and opportunities for carbon management in Malawi and Zambia. Carbon Management. 3(2). 159–173. 30 indexed citations
16.
Dyer, Jen, Lindsay C. Stringer, & Andrew J. Dougill. (2011). Jatropha curcas: Sowing local seeds of success in Malawi?. Journal of Arid Environments. 79. 107–110. 24 indexed citations
17.
Stringer, Lindsay C., David Mkwambisi, Andrew J. Dougill, & Jen Dyer. (2010). Adaptation to climate change and desertification: Perspectives from national policy and autonomous practice in Malawi. Climate and Development. 2(2). 145–160. 18 indexed citations
18.
Stringer, Lindsay C., Jen Dyer, Mark S. Reed, et al.. (2009). Adaptations to climate change, drought and desertification: local insights to enhance policy in southern Africa. Environmental Science & Policy. 12(7). 748–765. 241 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026