Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Numerical Analysis of Crack Propagation in Cyclic-Loaded Structures
1967744 citationsR. G. Forman, RM Engle et al.Journal of Basic Engineeringprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of R. G. Forman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. G. Forman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. G. Forman more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. G. Forman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. G. Forman. The network helps show where R. G. Forman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. G. Forman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. G. Forman.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. G. Forman based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. G. Forman. R. G. Forman is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hatamleh, Omar, R. G. Forman, & Jed Lyons. (2006). Effects of Laser and Shot Peening on Fatigue Crack Growth in Friction Stir Welds. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).1 indexed citations
4.
Forman, R. G., et al.. (2005). Fatigue Crack Growth Database for Damage Tolerance Analysis. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).68 indexed citations
Forman, R. G., et al.. (2004). NASGRO(registered trademark): Fracture Mechanics and Fatigue Crack Growth Analysis Software. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).18 indexed citations
7.
Newman, James C., et al.. (2002). Generating Fatigue Crack Growth Thresholds with Constant Amplitude Loads. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).5 indexed citations
Forman, R. G.. (1994). NASA/FLAGRO - FATIGUE CRACK GROWTH COMPUTER PROGRAM. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA).4 indexed citations
10.
Forman, R. G., V. Shivakumar, & James C. Newman. (1991). Fatigue-Crack-Growth Computer Program. NASA Tech Briefs. 15(4).49 indexed citations
11.
Forman, R. G., et al.. (1990). An evaluation of the fatigue crack growth and fracture toughness properties of beryllium-copper alloy CDA172. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).5 indexed citations
Forman, R. G.. (1974). Crack-growth behavior in thick welded plates of Inconel 718 at room and cryogenic temperatures. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).3 indexed citations
Forman, R. G., et al.. (1967). Numerical Analysis of Crack Propagation in Cyclic-Loaded Structures. Journal of Basic Engineering. 89(3). 459–463.744 indexed citations breakdown →
Forman, R. G., et al.. (1951). Oxide cathode base metal studies. Journal of research of the National Bureau of Standards. 46(1). 30–30.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.