Citations per year, relative to R. Edward Thomas R. Edward Thomas (= 1×)
peers
Magnus Fredriksson
Countries citing papers authored by R. Edward Thomas
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Edward Thomas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Edward Thomas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Edward Thomas more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Edward Thomas
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Edward Thomas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Edward Thomas. The network helps show where R. Edward Thomas may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Edward Thomas
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Edward Thomas.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Edward Thomas based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Edward Thomas. R. Edward Thomas is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Thomas, R. Edward. (2011). Validation of an internal hardwood log defect prediction model. 78. 77–82.3 indexed citations
7.
Buehlmann, Urs, et al.. (2008). Performance Evaluation of the Least-Cost Lumber Grade-Mix Solver. Wood and Fiber Science. 40(3). 427–435.3 indexed citations
8.
Thomas, R. Edward. (2008). Predicting Internal Yellow-Poplar Log Defect Features Using Surface Indicators. Wood and Fiber Science. 40(1). 14–22.17 indexed citations
9.
Buehlmann, Urs, et al.. (2004). Investigating the Linearity Assumption Between Lumber Grade Mix and Yield Using Design of Experiments (DOE). Wood and Fiber Science. 36(4). 547–559.7 indexed citations
10.
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1999). Effects of preprocessing 1 common and 2A common red oak lumber on gang-rip-first rough-mill dimension part yields.. Forest Products Journal. 49(3). 53–60.3 indexed citations
11.
Thomas, R. Edward. (1999). ROMI-RIP version 2.0: a new analysis tool for rip-first rough mill operations.. Forest Products Journal. 49(5). 35–40.8 indexed citations
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1997). Within-grade quality differences for 1 and 2A common lumber affect processsing and yields when gang-ripping red oak lumber. Forest Products Journal. 47(10). 85–90.1 indexed citations
14.
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1997). DEVELOPMENT OF TWO PROTOTYPE LIGHTED ICE SPAR BUOYS.1 indexed citations
15.
Thomas, R. Edward. (1996). Prioritizing parts from cutting bills when gang-ripping first. Forest Products Journal. 46(40). 61–66.16 indexed citations
16.
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1985). An exchange of letters. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 28(4). 365–367.7 indexed citations
17.
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1984). Analysis of lead-acid battery deep-cycle accelerated testing data. NASA STI/Recon Technical Report N. 84. 32736.3 indexed citations
18.
Thomas, R. Edward, et al.. (1978). Procedure for developing experimental designs for accelerated tests for service-life prediction. Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. 47–52.6 indexed citations
19.
Comoy, J, et al.. (1976). [Aseptic meningitis after isotope cisternography. 2 Cases].. PubMed. 22(6). 631–8.
20.
McCallum, J., R. Edward Thomas, & J. H. Waite. (1973). Accelerated testing of space batteries.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.