R. E. Lucas

697 total citations
11 papers, 339 citations indexed

About

R. E. Lucas is a scholar working on Plant Science, Soil Science and Pollution. According to data from OpenAlex, R. E. Lucas has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 339 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 4 papers in Plant Science, 3 papers in Soil Science and 2 papers in Pollution. Recurrent topics in R. E. Lucas's work include Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers) and Potato Plant Research (2 papers). R. E. Lucas is often cited by papers focused on Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics (2 papers), Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers) and Potato Plant Research (2 papers). R. E. Lucas collaborates with scholars based in United States, France and Morocco. R. E. Lucas's co-authors include J. F. Davis, Ignacio Salcedo, Boyd G. Ellis, D. D. Warncke, S. H. Wittwer, El Khalil Cherif, Tiago Domingos, Taha Ait Tchakoucht, Vânia Proença and V. Delmas and has published in prestigious journals such as Soil Science Society of America Journal, The Review of Economic Studies and Soil Science.

In The Last Decade

R. E. Lucas

10 papers receiving 275 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R. E. Lucas United States	7	137	84	64	44	40	11	339
Don E. Ethridge United States	11	94 0.7×	233 2.8×	55 0.9×	49 1.1×	41 1.0×	77	462
S. Meijer	4	60 0.4×	42 0.5×	49 0.8×	76 1.7×	12 0.3×	7	354
Darwin C. Hall United States	13	91 0.7×	243 2.9×	23 0.4×	51 1.2×	9 0.2×	31	503
Richard M. Klemme United States	9	90 0.7×	194 2.3×	162 2.5×	56 1.3×	9 0.2×	18	641
C. Edwin Young United States	10	22 0.2×	206 2.5×	136 2.1×	39 0.9×	19 0.5×	47	417
Chantal Line Carpentier United States	12	68 0.5×	124 1.5×	41 0.6×	24 0.5×	13 0.3×	23	364
Toshio Tabuchi Japan	7	96 0.7×	45 0.5×	78 1.2×	21 0.5×	4 0.1×	18	252
A. Jooste South Africa	9	46 0.3×	89 1.1×	36 0.6×	15 0.3×	16 0.4×	36	333
Glenn D. Schaible United States	12	52 0.4×	153 1.8×	79 1.2×	36 0.8×	23 0.6×	37	397
Kamil Maitah Czechia	11	65 0.5×	102 1.2×	26 0.4×	41 0.9×	38 0.9×	20	359

Countries citing papers authored by R. E. Lucas

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. E. Lucas's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. E. Lucas with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. E. Lucas more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. E. Lucas

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. E. Lucas. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. E. Lucas. The network helps show where R. E. Lucas may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. E. Lucas

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. E. Lucas. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. E. Lucas based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. E. Lucas. R. E. Lucas is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

11 of 11 papers shown

1.

Cherif, El Khalil, et al.. (2024). Predicting Fractional Shrub Cover in Heterogeneous Mediterranean Landscapes Using Machine Learning and Sentinel-2 Imagery. Forests. 15(10). 1739–1739. 3 indexed citations

2.

Delmas, V., et al.. (2005). Reconstruction 3D de l’appareil uro-génital à partir des coupes anatomiques de « visible human ». Morphologie. 89(287). 206–206.

3.

Lucas, R. E.. (1988). ON THE MECHANICS OF ECONOMIC GROWTH. 22. 3–42. 80 indexed citations

4.

Lucas, R. E., et al.. (1979). Phosphite Injury to Corn¹. Agronomy Journal. 71(6). 1063–1065. 12 indexed citations

5.

Salcedo, Ignacio, Boyd G. Ellis, & R. E. Lucas. (1979). Studies in Soil Manganese: II.: Extractable Manganese and Plant Uptake. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 43(1). 138–141. 14 indexed citations

6.

Lucas, R. E., et al.. (1979). Potential Corn Yield Related Economic Incentives for Soil Carbon Conservation. Transactions of the ASAE. 22(1). 75–80. 2 indexed citations

7.

Lucas, R. E.. (1970). Onion spacing and population studies.. 115. 1 indexed citations

8.

Lucas, R. E.. (1967). Tests of a Capital-Theoretic Model of Technological Change. The Review of Economic Studies. 34(2). 175–175. 27 indexed citations

9.

Lucas, R. E. & J. F. Davis. (1961). RELATIONSHIPS BETWEEN PH VALUES OF ORGANIC SOILS AND AVAILABILITIES OF 12 PLANT NUTRIENTS. Soil Science. 92(3). 177–182. 188 indexed citations

10.

Lucas, R. E., et al.. (1960). Maintaining High Soil Nutrient Levels for Greenhouse Tomatoes Without Excess Salt Accumulation. Soil Science Society of America Journal. 24(3). 214–218. 6 indexed citations

11.

Lucas, R. E., et al.. (1954). Effect of potassium carriers and phosphate— Potash ratios on the yield and quality of potatoes grown in organic soils. American Journal of Potato Research. 31(11). 349–352. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact