This map shows the geographic impact of R. Domrow's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Domrow with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Domrow more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Domrow. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Domrow. The network helps show where R. Domrow may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Domrow
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Domrow.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Domrow based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. Domrow. R. Domrow is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Domrow, R.. (1986). New and little known species of Trichonyssus Domrow (Acari: Dermanyssidae). Acarologia. 27(1). 17–29.3 indexed citations
2.
Domrow, R.. (1983). Acari from operation Drake in New Guinea.1. Pterygosomatidae. Acarologia. 24(4). 393–402.3 indexed citations
Fain, A. & R. Domrow. (1979). The family Hypoderidae (Acari) in Australia. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 103. 43–46.4 indexed citations
6.
Domrow, R.. (1979). Some dermanyssid mites lAcarirc mostly from Australasian rodents. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 103. 189–208.6 indexed citations
Fain, A & R. Domrow. (1974). Two new parasitic mites from Tasmanian marsupials (Sarcoptiformes: Sarcoptidae and Atopomelidae). Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales. 98. 122–130.2 indexed citations
9.
Domrow, R.. (1964). Fourteen species of Ptilonyssus from Australian birds (Acarina, Laelaptidae). Acarologia. 6(4). 595–623.1 indexed citations
10.
Domrow, R. & M. Nadchatram. (1964). Four Thai chiggers with expanded sensillae (Acarina: Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 6(3). 476–483.4 indexed citations
11.
Domrow, R. & Edward W. Baker. (1963). The genus Nihelia (Cheyletidae). Acarologia. 5(2). 225–231.3 indexed citations
12.
Domrow, R. & M. Nadchatram. (1962). Three new species of Doloisia from S.E. Asia (Acarina, Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 4(4). 577–585.4 indexed citations
13.
Domrow, R.. (1962). Seven new species of Laelaps from Malaysia (Acarina, Laelaptidae). Acarologia. 4(4). 503–519.4 indexed citations
14.
Domrow, R.. (1962). Four new species of Laurentella from S.E. Asia (Acarina, Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 4(4). 586–594.4 indexed citations
15.
Domrow, R.. (1962). The genus Schoutedenichia in S.E. Asia (Acarina, Trombiculidae). Acarologia. 4(3). 357–361.1 indexed citations
16.
Domrow, R.. (1960). The genus Austrochirus (Acarina, Listrophoridae). Acarologia. 2(1). 92–100.2 indexed citations
17.
Domrow, R.. (1956). Three new Australian chigger nymphs (Acarina, Trombiculidae). Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).2 indexed citations
Domrow, R.. (1956). Notes on Australian fur-mites lListrophoridaec Atopomelinaerc with description of a new genus. 80. 191–200.1 indexed citations
20.
Domrow, R.. (1955). The nymph of Euschongastia perameles (Womersley, 1939): Acarina, Trombiculidae. Biodiversity Heritage Library (Smithsonian Institution).1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.