R. Dias
- Geophysics top 2%
- Artificial Intelligence top 10%
- Cell Biology
- Geochemistry and Petrology top 10%
- Atmospheric Science
- Co-authors
- A. RibeiroC. CokeJosé RomãoTomás OliveiraAlexandre AraújoJorge PedroHelder I. ChaminéAntónio Mateus
- Topics
- Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (24 papers)Geological and Geochemical Analysis (22 papers)earthquake and tectonic studies (18 papers)
- Partner nations
- PortugalBrazilUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
R. Dias
26 papers receiving 806 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Geophysics 659
- Artificial Intelligence 116
- Cell Biology 67
- Geochemistry and Petrology 57
- Atmospheric Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by R. Dias
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Dias's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Dias with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Dias more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Dias
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Dias. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Dias. The network helps show where R. Dias may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Dias
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Dias. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Dias based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Dias. R. Dias is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 10 | |
| 4 | 25 | |
| 5 | 14 | |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 1 Vila Velha de Ródão Variscan complex syncline: stratigraphy and structure (Central-Iberian Zone, Portugal) | 0 |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | Geodynamics of Iberia, supercontinent cycles and metallogenic implications | 1 |
| 10 | 3 | |
| 11 | 21 | |
| 12 | Interplate versus intraplate strike-slip deformed belts: examples from SW Iberia Variscides | 0 |
| 13 | 100 | |
| 14 | Mação-Penhascoso laccolith granite: age and its implications (SWCentral- Iberia Zone) | 1 |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 235 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 10 | |
| 19 | 8 | |
| 20 | 118 |
About R. Dias
R. Dias is a scholar working on Geophysics, Earth-Surface Processes and Archeology, having authored 29 papers that have together received 833 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Geological and Geophysical Studies Worldwide (24 papers), Geological and Geochemical Analysis (22 papers) and earthquake and tectonic studies (18 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geophysics (659 citations), Geochemistry and Petrology (57 citations) and Earth-Surface Processes (33 citations). R. Dias has collaborated with scholars based in Portugal, Brazil and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include A. Ribeiro, C. Coke, José Romão, Tomás Oliveira, Alexandre Araújo, Jorge Pedro, Helder I. Chaminé, António Mateus, Eurico Pereira and J. Munhá. Their work appears in journals such as Neuroscience, Tectonophysics and The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.