R. Den Toom

424 total citations
10 papers, 189 citations indexed

About

R. Den Toom is a scholar working on Surgery, Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and Oncology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Den Toom has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 189 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Surgery, 8 papers in Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine and 2 papers in Oncology. Recurrent topics in R. Den Toom's work include Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (5 papers) and Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (4 papers). R. Den Toom is often cited by papers focused on Gallbladder and Bile Duct Disorders (6 papers), Kidney Stones and Urolithiasis Treatments (5 papers) and Abdominal Trauma and Injuries (4 papers). R. Den Toom collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands. R. Den Toom's co-authors include Onno T. Terpstra, J. Jeekel, H. G. T. Nijs, Peter W. Plaisier, Hajo A. Bruining, Erwin van der Harst, Cees Verhoef, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, Niels Komen and Geert W. M. Tetteroo and has published in prestigious journals such as British journal of surgery, Surgical Endoscopy and Endoscopy.

In The Last Decade

R. Den Toom

10 papers receiving 182 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Den Toom Netherlands 7 161 129 108 23 9 10 189
Hiromi Tokumura Japan 9 177 1.1× 140 1.1× 48 0.4× 8 0.3× 14 1.6× 33 208
Roberto Rimonda Italy 6 132 0.8× 38 0.3× 92 0.9× 16 0.7× 5 0.6× 7 170
Afag Aghayeva Türkiye 10 187 1.2× 66 0.5× 147 1.4× 27 1.2× 24 2.7× 26 226
I. Pirlet France 4 297 1.8× 91 0.7× 284 2.6× 14 0.6× 9 1.0× 9 336
S. Mucci-Hennekinne France 8 243 1.5× 65 0.5× 148 1.4× 8 0.3× 5 0.6× 9 282
Josephine Psaila United Kingdom 5 79 0.5× 58 0.4× 57 0.5× 24 1.0× 25 2.8× 6 131
R. Silvis Netherlands 7 104 0.6× 73 0.6× 61 0.6× 11 0.5× 7 0.8× 8 155
Filippo Carannante Italy 7 95 0.6× 60 0.5× 61 0.6× 14 0.6× 14 1.6× 30 142
Andreas Luhmann United Kingdom 6 177 1.1× 112 0.9× 39 0.4× 6 0.3× 6 0.7× 13 192
Andrea Picchetto Italy 7 89 0.6× 71 0.6× 63 0.6× 7 0.3× 7 0.8× 15 124

Countries citing papers authored by R. Den Toom

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Den Toom's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Den Toom with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Den Toom more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Den Toom

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Den Toom. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Den Toom. The network helps show where R. Den Toom may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Den Toom

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Den Toom. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Den Toom based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Den Toom. R. Den Toom is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

10 of 10 papers shown
1.
Komen, Niels, Juliette Slieker, Johannes H. W. de Wilt, et al.. (2011). High tie versus low tie in rectal surgery: comparison of anastomotic perfusion. International Journal of Colorectal Disease. 26(8). 1075–1078. 80 indexed citations
2.
Plaisier, Peter W., et al.. (1995). Quality of Life and the Course of Biliary and Gastrointestinal Symptoms after Laparoscopic and Conventional Cholecystectomy. Digestive Surgery. 12(2). 87–91. 7 indexed citations
3.
Plaisier, Peter W., et al.. (1994). Extracorporeal Shock-Wave Lithotripsy of Pancreatic Duct Stones: Immediate and Long-Term Results. Endoscopy. 26(7). 573–578. 41 indexed citations
4.
Plaisier, Peter W., et al.. (1994). Liver fibrosis after extracorporeal shock-wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones. Surgical Endoscopy. 8(11). 1335–1337. 4 indexed citations
5.
Plaisier, Peter W., et al.. (1994). Quality of life after treatment of gallstones: results of a randomised study of lithotripsy and open cholecystectomy.. PubMed. 160(11). 613–7. 7 indexed citations
6.
Brakel, K., R. Den Toom, Johan S. Laméris, et al.. (1993). The Value of Ultrasound in the Follow-up of Patients Treated with Biliary Lithotripsy Implications for Monitoring Patients after Nonsurgical Therapy of Gallbladder Stones. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology. 28(3). 197–201. 1 indexed citations
7.
Toom, R. Den, H. Vergunst, H. G. T. Nijs, et al.. (1992). Electromagnetic shock wave lithotripsy of gallbladder stones: a wide range of inclusion criteria.. PubMed. 87(4). 498–503. 12 indexed citations
8.
Toom, R. Den, et al.. (1991). Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy of pancreatic duct stones.. PubMed. 86(8). 1033–6. 21 indexed citations
9.
Toom, R. Den, Marion de Jong, Eric P. Krenning, et al.. (1991). Euro‐Collins Solution Versus Uw‐Solution for Long‐Term Liver Preservation in the Isolated Rat‐Liver Perfusion Model. HPB Surgery. 4(4). 313–320. 5 indexed citations
10.
Toom, R. Den, et al.. (1991). Extracorporeal shock wave treatment of common bile duct stones: Experience with two different lithotriptors at a single institution. British journal of surgery. 78(7). 809–813. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hiromi Tokumura Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Roberto Rimonda Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Afag Aghayeva Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by I. Pirlet Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by S. Mucci-Hennekinne Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Josephine Psaila Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by R. Silvis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Filippo Carannante Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andreas Luhmann Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Andrea Picchetto
Rankless by CCL
2026