R. Deck

728 total citations
53 papers, 535 citations indexed

About

R. Deck is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, General Health Professions and Clinical Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Deck has authored 53 papers receiving a total of 535 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 26 papers in General Health Professions and 18 papers in Clinical Psychology. Recurrent topics in R. Deck's work include Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (31 papers), Health and Medical Studies (24 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (16 papers). R. Deck is often cited by papers focused on Medical Practices and Rehabilitation (31 papers), Health and Medical Studies (24 papers) and Psychiatric care and mental health services (16 papers). R. Deck collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Switzerland. R. Deck's co-authors include Wolfgang Bürger, V. Hádek, R. B. Somoano, Heiner Raspe, A. M. Hermann, Timir Datta, Angelika Hüppe, Nadine Janis Pohontsch, H. Raspe and S. P. S. Yen and has published in prestigious journals such as The Journal of Chemical Physics, Journal of Applied Physics and Solid State Communications.

In The Last Decade

R. Deck

50 papers receiving 507 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Deck Germany 14 172 143 137 99 67 53 535
Murray L. Katcher United States 19 100 0.6× 17 0.1× 44 0.3× 36 0.4× 74 1.1× 44 1.5k
M. Saito Japan 11 63 0.4× 23 0.2× 188 1.4× 88 0.9× 16 0.2× 38 700
Caroline S. Clarke United Kingdom 14 74 0.4× 7 0.0× 150 1.1× 78 0.8× 33 0.5× 61 629
David C. Lloyd United Kingdom 12 150 0.9× 18 0.1× 73 0.5× 212 2.1× 9 0.1× 29 707
Fernando Gimeno Marco Spain 16 59 0.3× 49 0.3× 33 0.2× 16 0.2× 16 0.2× 76 949
Hyejin Kim United States 9 34 0.2× 19 0.1× 65 0.5× 47 0.5× 8 0.1× 22 322
Kazushi Hotta Japan 13 33 0.2× 29 0.2× 51 0.4× 19 0.2× 12 0.2× 42 365
Xuan Yang China 15 101 0.6× 5 0.0× 32 0.2× 141 1.4× 64 1.0× 28 774
Andrew Sibley United Kingdom 12 140 0.8× 10 0.1× 72 0.5× 5 0.1× 30 0.4× 26 494
Shu-Ling Huang Taiwan 14 143 0.8× 21 0.1× 10 0.1× 22 0.2× 87 1.3× 23 418

Countries citing papers authored by R. Deck

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Deck's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Deck with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Deck more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Deck

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Deck. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Deck. The network helps show where R. Deck may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Deck

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Deck. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Deck based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Deck. R. Deck is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
4.
Deck, R., et al.. (2015). Reha abgelehnt – und dann?. Die Rehabilitation. 54(6). 382–388.
5.
Deck, R., et al.. (2014). Strukturen und Prozesse in der ambulanten Neurorehabilitation. Die Rehabilitation. 53(3). 168–175. 5 indexed citations
6.
Deck, R. & Angelika Hüppe. (2014). Begleitete Nachsorge in der Psychosomatik – Transfer des neuen Credo. Die Rehabilitation. 53(5). 305–312. 5 indexed citations
7.
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis, et al.. (2014). Informationsbedarf zur medizinischen Rehabilitation der Deutschen Rentenversicherung – Ergebnisse eines Online-Surveys mit niedergelassenen Ärzten. Das Gesundheitswesen. 77(5). 362–367. 21 indexed citations
8.
Pohontsch, Nadine Janis, et al.. (2011). Medizinische Rehabilitation bei älteren Versicherten (55plus): Ergebnisse einer qualitativen Studie mit Rehabilitanden und Reha-Klinikern. Die Rehabilitation. 50(6). 390–396. 2 indexed citations
9.
10.
Bürger, Wolfgang & R. Deck. (2009). SIBAR – ein kurzes Screening-Instrument zur Messung des Bedarfs an berufsbezogenen Behandlungsangeboten in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Die Rehabilitation. 48(4). 211–221. 48 indexed citations
11.
12.
Deck, R., et al.. (2009). Identifikation von potenziellem Reha-Bedarf in der Hausarztpraxis: Idee und Wirklichkeit. Die Rehabilitation. 48(2). 73–83. 15 indexed citations
13.
Deck, R.. (2008). Soziale Ungleichheit in der medizinischen Rehabilitation. Das Gesundheitswesen. 70(10). 582–589. 17 indexed citations
14.
Meyer, Thorsten, R. Deck, & Heiner Raspe. (2006). Gültigkeit von Fragebogenangaben in der Rehabilitationsforschung: Unter welchen Bedingungen füllen Patienten Fragebogen aus?. Die Rehabilitation. 45(2). 118–127. 6 indexed citations
19.
Somoano, R. B., et al.. (1975). The electrical and magnetic properties of (TTF)(I)0.71. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 63(11). 4970–4976. 73 indexed citations
20.
Deck, R., et al.. (1970). Microstructural Effects in Critical Fields of Niobium Films. Journal of Applied Physics. 41(13). 5346–5348.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026