R. D. Voth

412 total citations
10 papers, 303 citations indexed

About

R. D. Voth is a scholar working on Plant Science, Molecular Biology and Insect Science. According to data from OpenAlex, R. D. Voth has authored 10 papers receiving a total of 303 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Plant Science, 4 papers in Molecular Biology and 4 papers in Insect Science. Recurrent topics in R. D. Voth's work include Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers). R. D. Voth is often cited by papers focused on Insect and Pesticide Research (4 papers), Genetically Modified Organisms Research (3 papers) and Insect Resistance and Genetics (3 papers). R. D. Voth collaborates with scholars based in United States and Germany. R. D. Voth's co-authors include James K. Roberts, Mark Oppenhuizen, Frederick J. Perlak, Karen S. Gustafson, J. R. Bradley, John Van Duyn, John J. Adamczyk, John R. Ruberson, B. R. Leonard and J. W. Mullins and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Plant Journal and Journal of Applied Ecology.

In The Last Decade

R. D. Voth

9 papers receiving 273 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
R. D. Voth United States	4	260	194	192	20	14	10	303
Eric S. Sachs United States	7	271 1.0×	215 1.1×	164 0.9×	24 1.2×	7 0.5×	10	304
Shannon Heuberger United States	9	329 1.3×	274 1.4×	210 1.1×	9 0.5×	8 0.6×	11	357
T. W. Patton United States	5	267 1.0×	204 1.1×	216 1.1×	6 0.3×	19 1.4×	10	323
K. S. Knighten United States	6	373 1.4×	242 1.2×	292 1.5×	14 0.7×	18 1.3×	9	388
Rogers Leonard United States	7	383 1.5×	252 1.3×	307 1.6×	9 0.5×	4 0.3×	10	410
Monica Garcia‐Alonso United Kingdom	8	224 0.9×	205 1.1×	100 0.5×	22 1.1×	4 0.3×	10	253
M. I. Ali United States	10	325 1.3×	226 1.2×	304 1.6×	5 0.3×	19 1.4×	27	387
G. B. Cronholm United States	8	303 1.2×	239 1.2×	234 1.2×	4 0.2×	5 0.4×	11	333
Amanda L. Patin United States	8	516 2.0×	356 1.8×	448 2.3×	7 0.3×	16 1.1×	10	560
Haonan Zhang China	7	586 2.3×	343 1.8×	452 2.4×	6 0.3×	8 0.6×	7	613

Countries citing papers authored by R. D. Voth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. D. Voth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. D. Voth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. D. Voth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. D. Voth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. D. Voth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. D. Voth. The network helps show where R. D. Voth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. D. Voth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. D. Voth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. D. Voth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. D. Voth. R. D. Voth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

10 of 10 papers shown

1.

Voth, R. D., et al.. (2013). Quality improvement of fingerprints of decayed corpses by local thanatopractical processing (Thanatoprint). SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 2. Doc15–Doc15. 1 indexed citations

2.

Head, Graham, R. E. Jackson, John J. Adamczyk, et al.. (2010). Spatial and temporal variability in host use by Helicoverpa zea as measured by analyses of stable carbon isotope ratios and gossypol residues. Journal of Applied Ecology. 47(3). 583–592. 75 indexed citations

3.

Jackson, R. E., J. R. Bradley, John Van Duyn, et al.. (2008). Regional assessment of Helicoverpa zea populations on cotton and non‐cotton crop hosts. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata. 126(2). 89–106. 63 indexed citations

4.

Ruberson, John R., et al.. (2004). Abundance of heliothine moths in traps at the interface of Bt cotton with various crops: 2003. 3 indexed citations

5.

Perlak, Frederick J., et al.. (2001). Development and commercial use of Bollgard^®cotton in the USA – early promises versus today's reality. The Plant Journal. 27(6). 489–501. 150 indexed citations

6.

Kerby, T. A. & R. D. Voth. (1998). Roundup Ready--introduction experiences in 1997 as discussed in the Beltwide Cotton Production Conference Weed Management: Transgenics & new technologies panel.. Europe PMC (PubMed Central). 1. 26–29. 5 indexed citations

7.

Voth, R. D., et al.. (1984). Weed control in dormant turf grass with glyphosate.. 15–19. 2 indexed citations

8.

Voth, R. D. & D. R. Christenson. (1980). Yield, Quality and Tissue N and Mn Levels as Affected by Interactions Between Applied N and Mn. Journal of Sugarbeet Research. 20(6). 544–552. 2 indexed citations

9.

Selim, H. M. & R. D. Voth. (1980). Soil water behavior under different tillage practices.. 23(3). 14–15.

10.

Voth, R. D. & D. R. Christenson. (1980). Effect of Fertilizer Reaction and Placement on Availability of Manganese¹. Agronomy Journal. 72(5). 769–773. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact