Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake of 26 December 2004
2005858 citationsR. C. Aster et al.Scienceprofile →
Episodic zircon age spectra of orogenic granitoids: The supercontinent connection and continental growth
2010395 citationsKent C. Condie, R. C. Asterprofile →
This map shows the geographic impact of R. C. Aster's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. C. Aster with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. C. Aster more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. C. Aster. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. C. Aster. The network helps show where R. C. Aster may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. C. Aster
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. C. Aster.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. C. Aster based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with R. C. Aster. R. C. Aster is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Lloyd, Andrew, Douglas A. Wiens, Jeroen Tromp, et al.. (2016). Full Waveform Adjoint Seismic Tomography of the Antarctic Plate. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2016.1 indexed citations
McNamara, D. E., et al.. (2014). Constraints on recent earthquake source parameters, fault geometry and aftershock characteristics in Oklahoma. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014.2 indexed citations
13.
Chaput, Julien, et al.. (2013). Recovering Seismic Green's Functions Using Icequake Coda Interferometry at Erebus volcano, Antarctica. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2013.1 indexed citations
14.
Wiens, Douglas A., David S. Heeszel, Xinlei Sun, et al.. (2013). Lithospheric Structure of Antarctica and Implications for Geological and Cryospheric Evolution. EGU General Assembly Conference Abstracts.2 indexed citations
15.
Hernández, Stephen, Douglas A. Wiens, S. Anandakrishnan, et al.. (2009). Seismic Anisotropy of the Antarctic Upper Mantle from Shear Wave Splitting Analysis of POLENET and AGAP Seismograms. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2009.3 indexed citations
16.
Condie, Kent C. & R. C. Aster. (2008). Episodicity of Orogeny Revisited. AGUFM. 2008.1 indexed citations
17.
Lombeyda, Santiago, Vala Hjörleifsdóttir, Jeroen Tromp, & R. C. Aster. (2005). The Great Sumatra-Andaman Earthquake. CaltechAUTHORS (California Institute of Technology).328 indexed citations breakdown →
18.
Aster, R. C., et al.. (2005). Seismic Moment Rate Function Inversions from Very Long Period Signals Associated with Strombolian Eruptions at Mount Erebus, Antarctica. AGUFM. 2005.1 indexed citations
19.
Gao, Wei, S. P. Grand, M. E. West, et al.. (2002). Mantle Dynamics Beneath the Rio Grande Rift and Colorado Plateau.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.