M. Withers

1.1k total citations
22 papers, 881 citations indexed

About

M. Withers is a scholar working on Geophysics, Artificial Intelligence and Civil and Structural Engineering. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Withers has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 881 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 18 papers in Geophysics, 7 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 1 paper in Civil and Structural Engineering. Recurrent topics in M. Withers's work include Seismic Waves and Analysis (15 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (15 papers) and Seismology and Earthquake Studies (7 papers). M. Withers is often cited by papers focused on Seismic Waves and Analysis (15 papers), earthquake and tectonic studies (15 papers) and Seismology and Earthquake Studies (7 papers). M. Withers collaborates with scholars based in United States and United Kingdom. M. Withers's co-authors include R. C. Aster, Christopher J. Young, J.I. Beiriger, S.G. Moore, Eric P. Chael, H. Benz, R. B. Herrmann, C. A. Powell, S. Horton and Heather R. DeShon and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America and Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth.

In The Last Decade

M. Withers

21 papers receiving 838 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
M. Withers United States 11 844 509 77 47 44 22 881
Eric P. Chael United States 15 732 0.9× 288 0.6× 88 1.1× 21 0.4× 53 1.2× 34 776
Luca Elia Italy 14 555 0.7× 492 1.0× 45 0.6× 61 1.3× 48 1.1× 30 654
Dominique Gillard United States 11 1.1k 1.3× 171 0.3× 86 1.1× 14 0.3× 21 0.5× 14 1.1k
Hannes Vasyura‐Bathke Germany 12 641 0.8× 231 0.5× 35 0.5× 26 0.6× 24 0.5× 27 694
Thessa Tormann Switzerland 12 776 0.9× 274 0.5× 21 0.3× 20 0.4× 32 0.7× 24 840
Stephen P. Horton United States 8 494 0.6× 224 0.4× 88 1.1× 15 0.3× 20 0.5× 17 549
Dimitri Zigone France 17 1.1k 1.3× 318 0.6× 148 1.9× 43 0.9× 26 0.6× 42 1.1k
Jeen-Hwa Wang Taiwan 17 943 1.1× 269 0.5× 48 0.6× 50 1.1× 213 4.8× 90 1.1k
Frode Ringdal Norway 14 1.1k 1.3× 592 1.2× 88 1.1× 30 0.6× 14 0.3× 28 1.2k
Felipe Leyton Chile 19 1.2k 1.4× 227 0.4× 75 1.0× 50 1.1× 269 6.1× 42 1.2k

Countries citing papers authored by M. Withers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Withers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Withers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Withers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Withers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Withers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Withers. The network helps show where M. Withers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Withers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Withers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Withers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Withers. M. Withers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Ebel, John E., M. C. Chapman, Won‐Young Kim, & M. Withers. (2019). Current Status and Future of Regional Seismic Network Monitoring in the Central and Eastern United States. Seismological Research Letters. 91(2A). 660–676. 6 indexed citations
2.
Langston, Charles A., et al.. (2015). Local Magnitude and Anomalous Amplitude Distance Decay in the Eastern Tennessee Seismic Zone. Seismological Research Letters. 86(3). 1040–1050. 10 indexed citations
3.
Horton, S., et al.. (2014). Earthquake Focal Mechanisms in the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Seismological Research Letters. 85(2). 257–267. 19 indexed citations
4.
Langston, Charles A., et al.. (2014). Mysterious Tremor-Like Signals Seen on the Reelfoot Fault, Northern Tennessee. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 104(5). 2194–2205. 5 indexed citations
5.
Powell, C. A., et al.. (2013). Crustal velocity structure associated with the eastern Tennessee seismic zone: Vp and Vs images based upon local earthquake tomography. Journal of Geophysical Research Solid Earth. 119(1). 464–489. 21 indexed citations
6.
Ellsworth, W. L., S. Horton, H. Benz, et al.. (2012). Tremors in the Bayou: The Events on the Napoleonville Salt Dome, Louisiana. AGUFM. 2012. 5 indexed citations
7.
Hamburger, Michael, et al.. (2011). Aftershocks of the 2008 Mt. Carmel, Illinois, Earthquake: Evidence for Conjugate Faulting near the Termination of the Wabash Valley Fault System. Seismological Research Letters. 82(5). 735–747. 15 indexed citations
8.
Powell, C. A., et al.. (2010). Intrusions and anomalous Vp/Vsratios associated with the New Madrid seismic zone. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres. 115(B8). 28 indexed citations
9.
Langston, Charles A., et al.. (2010). The Enola, Arkansas, Intraplate Swarm of 2001. Seismological Research Letters. 81(3). 549–559. 17 indexed citations
10.
Powell, C. A. & M. Withers. (2009). The Effects of Mississippi Embayment Sediments on Local Earthquake Tomography. Seismological Research Letters. 80(1). 149–158. 3 indexed citations
11.
Herrmann, R. B., M. Withers, & H. Benz. (2008). The April 18, 2008 Illinois Earthquake: An ANSS Monitoring Success. Seismological Research Letters. 79(6). 830–843. 36 indexed citations
12.
Withers, M., et al.. (2006). Implementing ShakeMap for the New Madrid Seismic Zone. Seismological Research Letters. 77(4). 445–452. 2 indexed citations
13.
Hamburger, Michael, et al.. (2002). Seismotectonic Setting of the June 18, 2002, Evansville, Indiana Earthquake: Or What's a Nice Earthquake Like You Doing in a Place Like This?. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2002. 1 indexed citations
14.
Horton, S., Paul Bodin, Arch C. Johnston, et al.. (2001). Source Characteristics of Aftershocks of the India Republic Day Earthquake. AGUSM. 2001. 1 indexed citations
15.
Withers, M., R. C. Aster, & Christopher J. Young. (1999). An automated local and regional seismic event detection and location system using waveform correlation. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 89(3). 657–669. 39 indexed citations
16.
Withers, M., et al.. (1998). A comparison of select trigger algorithms for automated global seismic phase and event detection. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 88(1). 95–106. 436 indexed citations
17.
Armbruster, J. G., Paul Bodin, Edward Cranswick, et al.. (1998). Preliminary results from the investigation of the Pymatuning earthquake of September 25, 1998. 29(4). 2–14. 2 indexed citations
18.
Withers, M., R. C. Aster, Christopher J. Young, & Eric P. Chael. (1996). High-frequency analysis of seismic background noise as a function of wind speed and shallow depth. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America. 86(5). 1507–1515. 133 indexed citations
19.
Young, Christopher J., J.I. Beiriger, M. Withers, et al.. (1995). WCEDS: A Waveform Correlation Event Detection System,. University of North Texas Digital Library (University of North Texas). 1 indexed citations
20.
Withers, M.. (1993). Why do tides exist?. The Physics Teacher. 31(7). 394–398. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026