R. Brady

717 total citations
22 papers, 513 citations indexed

About

R. Brady is a scholar working on Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, Physiology and Cognitive Neuroscience. According to data from OpenAlex, R. Brady has authored 22 papers receiving a total of 513 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 9 papers in Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation, 5 papers in Physiology and 4 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience. Recurrent topics in R. Brady's work include Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (9 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers). R. Brady is often cited by papers focused on Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (9 papers), Spaceflight effects on biology (5 papers) and Motor Control and Adaptation (4 papers). R. Brady collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Japan. R. Brady's co-authors include Jacob J. Bloomberg, Brian T. Peters, Ajitkumar P. Mulavara, Tammy M. Owings, Mark D. Grabiner, Michael J. Pavol, Chris Miller, Helen S. Cohen, Alan H. Feiveson and M. Zachary Rosenthal and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Biomechanics, Experimental Brain Research and Gait & Posture.

In The Last Decade

R. Brady

21 papers receiving 481 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
R. Brady United States 12 185 153 109 99 73 22 513
Konstantin Popov Russia 15 171 0.9× 124 0.8× 320 2.9× 85 0.9× 31 0.4× 31 753
Rahul Goel United States 12 110 0.6× 48 0.3× 131 1.2× 49 0.5× 40 0.5× 36 444
Tiffany R. Morris United States 11 307 1.7× 58 0.4× 105 1.0× 249 2.5× 124 1.7× 13 630
William P. Huebner United States 11 90 0.5× 73 0.5× 227 2.1× 36 0.4× 18 0.2× 18 550
K. E. Popov Russia 14 365 2.0× 125 0.8× 509 4.7× 217 2.2× 100 1.4× 30 838
L. Lefort France 6 359 1.9× 52 0.3× 355 3.3× 156 1.6× 167 2.3× 6 881
Byron K. Lichtenberg United States 10 64 0.3× 292 1.9× 268 2.5× 35 0.4× 15 0.2× 16 696
Robert LeMoyne United States 15 191 1.0× 37 0.2× 64 0.6× 462 4.7× 119 1.6× 88 871
Lionel Bringoux France 15 132 0.7× 65 0.4× 561 5.1× 159 1.6× 23 0.3× 52 810
Antoinette Domingo United States 12 154 0.8× 33 0.2× 100 0.9× 471 4.8× 145 2.0× 23 730

Countries citing papers authored by R. Brady

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of R. Brady's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Brady with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Brady more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by R. Brady

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Brady. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Brady. The network helps show where R. Brady may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Brady

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Brady. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Brady based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Brady. R. Brady is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Kim, Kwanguk, M. Zachary Rosenthal, David J. Zielinski, & R. Brady. (2012). Comparison of desktop, head mounted display, and six wall fully immersive systems using a stressful task. 143–144. 44 indexed citations
2.
Brady, R., et al.. (2012). Gait adaptability training is affected by visual dependency. Experimental Brain Research. 220(1). 1–9. 31 indexed citations
3.
Peters, Brian T., R. Brady, & Jacob J. Bloomberg. (2012). Walking on an Oscillating Treadmill: Strategies of Stride-Time Adaptation. Ecological Psychology. 24(4). 265–278. 8 indexed citations
4.
Cohen, Helen S., et al.. (2012). Vestibular-somatosensory convergence in head movement control during locomotion after long-duration space flight1. Journal of Vestibular Research. 22(2-3). 153–166. 38 indexed citations
5.
Brady, R., Brian T. Peters, Robert Ploutz‐Snyder, et al.. (2011). Gait training improves performance in healthy adults exposed to novel sensory discordant conditions. Experimental Brain Research. 209(4). 515–524. 21 indexed citations
6.
Peters, Brian T., et al.. (2011). Dynamic Visual Acuity During Walking After Long-Duration Spaceflight. Aviation Space and Environmental Medicine. 82(4). 463–466. 30 indexed citations
7.
Mulavara, Ajitkumar P., Alan H. Feiveson, Helen S. Cohen, et al.. (2010). Locomotor function after long-duration space flight: effects and motor learning during recovery. Experimental Brain Research. 202(3). 649–659. 101 indexed citations
8.
Brady, R., Brian T. Peters, & Jacob J. Bloomberg. (2009). Strategies of healthy adults walking on a laterally oscillating treadmill. Gait & Posture. 29(4). 645–649. 34 indexed citations
9.
Brady, R., et al.. (2007). Assistive technology curriculum structure and content in professional preparation service provider training programs.. PubMed. 36(4). 183–92. 13 indexed citations
10.
Miller, Chris, et al.. (2006). Effects of Walking Speed and Visual-Target Distance on Toe Trajectory During Swing Phase. NASA STI Repository (National Aeronautics and Space Administration). 1 indexed citations
11.
Mulavara, Ajitkumar P., R. Brady, Chris Miller, et al.. (2006). The Use of Dynamic Visual Acuity as a Functional Test of Gaze Stabilization Following Space Flight. NASA Technical Reports Server (NASA). 1 indexed citations
12.
Nomura, Yasuyuki, et al.. (2005). Optic flow dominates visual scene polarity in causing adaptive modification of locomotor trajectory. Cognitive Brain Research. 25(3). 624–631. 18 indexed citations
13.
Brady, R., et al.. (2003). BARD: a visualization tool for biological sequence analysis. 219–225. 7 indexed citations
14.
Brady, R., et al.. (2002). Crumbs: a virtual environment tracking tool for biological imaging. 18–25,. 19 indexed citations
15.
Long, Toby, R. Brady, & E. Virginia Lapham. (2001). A Survey of Genetics Knowledge of Health Professionals: Implications for Physical Therapists. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 13(4). 156–163. 3 indexed citations
16.
Long, Toby, et al.. (2001). A Survey of Genetics Knowledge of Health Professionals: Implications for Physical Therapists. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 13(4). 156–163. 2 indexed citations
17.
Long, Toby, R. Brady, & E. Virginia Lapham. (2001). A Survey of Genetics Knowledge of Health Professionals: Implications for Physical Therapists. Pediatric Physical Therapy. 13(4). 156–163. 5 indexed citations
18.
Brady, R., Michael J. Pavol, Tammy M. Owings, & Mark D. Grabiner. (2000). Foot displacement but not velocity predicts the outcome of a slip induced in young subjects while walking. Journal of Biomechanics. 33(7). 803–808. 112 indexed citations
19.
Potter, Clinton S., et al.. (1996). EVAC: a virtual environment for control of remote imaging instrumentation. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications. 16(4). 62–66. 11 indexed citations
20.
Brady, R. & Clinton S. Potter. (1992). A real-time 3D volume rendering technique on a massively parallel supercomputer.. Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE. 1660. 712–715. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026