R. Bender
Impact in
- Instrumentation top 5%
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research
- Astronomy and Astrophysics top 10%
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies
- Gamma-ray bursts and supernovae
- Astrophysical Phenomena and Observations
Papers in
-
- Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena 4
- Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies 4
- Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies 2
-
- Astronomy and Astrophysical Research 2
- Co-authors
- Claudia Maraston (1 shared paper)D. Thomas (1 shared paper)R. P. Saglia (3 shared papers)T. Valentinuzzi (1 shared paper)Simon D. M. White (1 shared paper)Dennis Zaritsky (1 shared paper)P. Sánchez–Blázquez (1 shared paper)G. De Lucia (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society (2 papers)Astronomy and Astrophysics (1 paper)Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- GermanyUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
R. Bender
4 papers receiving 172 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 14
- Instrumentation 132
- Astronomy and Astrophysics 176
- Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 7
- Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 10
- Nuclear and High Energy Physics 4
Countries citing papers authored by R. Bender
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Bender's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Bender with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Bender more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Bender
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Bender. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Bender. The network helps show where R. Bender may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 24 scholars most cited alongside R. Bender, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2003 | 85 | |
| 2 | 2010 | 65 | |
| 3 | 2014 | 21 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 5 |
About R. Bender
R. Bender is a scholar working on Astronomy and Astrophysics, Instrumentation, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 4 papers that have together received 176 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena (4 papers), Stellar, planetary, and galactic studies (4 papers), Astronomy and Astrophysical Research (2 papers) and Astrophysics and Star Formation Studies (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Instrumentation (132 citations), Astronomy and Astrophysics (176 citations), Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (7 citations), Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (10 citations) and Nuclear and High Energy Physics (4 citations). R. Bender has collaborated with scholars based in Germany, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Claudia Maraston, D. Thomas, R. P. Saglia, T. Valentinuzzi, Simon D. M. White, Dennis Zaritsky, P. Sánchez–Blázquez, G. De Lucia, Alfonso Aragón‐Salamanca and B. Milvang‐Jensen. Their work appears in journals such as Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Astronomy and Astrophysics and Springer Link (Chiba Institute of Technology).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.