R. Andrew Fowler
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 5%
- Biomedical Engineering
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering
- Polymers and Plastics
- Co-authors
- Raymond A. ChitwoodJennifer J. SiegelAndrew K. DunnXiaoling WeiChong XieZhengtuo ZhaoLan LuanOjas Potnis
- Topics
- Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers)Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (4 papers)Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Colloid and Interface ScienceScience AdvancesThe Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited StatesNorway
In The Last Decade
R. Andrew Fowler
8 papers receiving 556 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 57
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 401
- Biomedical Engineering 244
- Cognitive Neuroscience 208
- Electrical and Electronic Engineering 160
- Polymers and Plastics 86
Countries citing papers authored by R. Andrew Fowler
This map shows the geographic impact of R. Andrew Fowler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by R. Andrew Fowler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites R. Andrew Fowler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by R. Andrew Fowler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by R. Andrew Fowler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by R. Andrew Fowler. The network helps show where R. Andrew Fowler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of R. Andrew Fowler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of R. Andrew Fowler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of R. Andrew Fowler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with R. Andrew Fowler. R. Andrew Fowler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | Ultraflexible nanoelectronic probes form reliable, glial scar–free neural integrationbreakdown → | 432 |
| 3 | 12 | |
| 4 | 16 | |
| 5 | 16 | |
| 6 | 12 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 38 | |
| 9 | 34 |
About R. Andrew Fowler
R. Andrew Fowler is a scholar working on Biophysics, Biomedical Engineering and Biomaterials, having authored 9 papers that have together received 562 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Ultrasound and Hyperthermia Applications (7 papers), Photoacoustic and Ultrasonic Imaging (4 papers) and Nanoparticle-Based Drug Delivery (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (401 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (208 citations) and Polymers and Plastics (86 citations). R. Andrew Fowler has collaborated with scholars based in France, United States and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Raymond A. Chitwood, Jennifer J. Siegel, Andrew K. Dunn, Xiaoling Wei, Chong Xie, Zhengtuo Zhao, Lan Luan, Ojas Potnis, S. Lin and Esben A. Nilssen. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Colloid and Interface Science, Science Advances and The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.