Quah Boon Long
About
In The Last Decade
Quah Boon Long
5 papers receiving 183 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 28
- Pathology and Forensic Medicine 151
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 112
- Ophthalmology 75
- Epidemiology 72
- Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging 29
Countries citing papers authored by Quah Boon Long
This map shows the geographic impact of Quah Boon Long's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quah Boon Long with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quah Boon Long more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Quah Boon Long
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Quah Boon Long. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Quah Boon Long. The network helps show where Quah Boon Long may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Quah Boon Long
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Quah Boon Long. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Quah Boon Long based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Quah Boon Long. Quah Boon Long is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 34 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 81 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 68 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.