Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The MYB Transcription Factor Superfamily of Arabidopsis: Expression Analysis and Phylogenetic Comparison with the Rice MYB Family
2006765 citationsYanhui Chen, Kun He et al.Plant Molecular Biologyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Qu L's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qu L with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qu L more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qu L. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qu L. The network helps show where Qu L may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Qu L
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Qu L.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Qu L based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Qu L. Qu L is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Chen, Yanhui, Kun He, Meihua Liu, et al.. (2006). The MYB Transcription Factor Superfamily of Arabidopsis: Expression Analysis and Phylogenetic Comparison with the Rice MYB Family. Plant Molecular Biology. 60(1). 107–124.765 indexed citations breakdown →
3.
Huang, Jinxia, et al.. (2004). A Preliminary Study on the Origin and Evolution of Chalcone Synthase ( CHS ) Gene in Angiosperms. Zhiwu xuebao. 46(1). 10–19.18 indexed citations
4.
L, Qu, et al.. (2003). Evolution of COP9 Signalosome and Proteasome Lid Complex. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 45(5). 523–529.1 indexed citations
5.
Chen, Zhangliang & Qu L. (2002). The status of agriculture biotechnology in China.. 6–7.3 indexed citations
6.
Zhang, Wenju, et al.. (1998). ITS1 AND ITS2 SEQUENCES OF FOUR POSSIBLE DONORS TO BREAD WHEAT GENOME AND THEIR PHYLOGENETIC RELATIONSHIPS. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 40(11).3 indexed citations
7.
Chen, Yuxin, et al.. (1998). [Sequence analysis of 25S rDNA from Chinese medicinal plant duzhong Eucommia ulmoides Oliv].. PubMed. 23(12). 707–9, 762.1 indexed citations
8.
L, Qu. (1998). Age differences between brides and grooms in Australia.. PubMed. 27–27.3 indexed citations
9.
Chen, Zhangliang & Qu L. (1997). Plant Molecular Biology in China. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 15(3). 273–277.1 indexed citations
10.
Chen, Xin, et al.. (1996). Molecular Cloning and Sequence Analysis of a Gene Encoding Rice Proteinase Inhibitor. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 38(6).4 indexed citations
11.
L, Qu, et al.. (1995). Molecular Cloning and Sequence Analysis of a Gene Encoding Rice 10 kD Prolamin. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 37(7).1 indexed citations
12.
L, Qu, et al.. (1995). cDNA Cloning and Structural Analysis of Rice ADP-Glucose Pyrophosphorylase Gene. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology. 37(12).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.