Qing Xue
- Clinical Psychology top 2%
- General Health Professions top 2%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Neurology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Jiahong QinGuangqin LiYu‐Ping WangPeng MaoYuan YangFiammetta CosciQing TianLu Yin
- Topics
- Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers)Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers)EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers)
- Journals
- IEEE Transactions on Biomedical EngineeringEpilepsiaTechnological Forecasting and Social Change
- Partner nations
- ChinaUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Qing Xue
37 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Clinical Psychology 1.0k
- General Health Professions 567
- Economics and Econometrics 341
- Cognitive Neuroscience 264
- Neurology 201
Countries citing papers authored by Qing Xue
This map shows the geographic impact of Qing Xue's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Qing Xue with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Qing Xue more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Qing Xue
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Qing Xue. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Qing Xue. The network helps show where Qing Xue may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Qing Xue
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Qing Xue. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Qing Xue based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Qing Xue. Qing Xue is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | Mental Health and Psychosocial Problems of Medical Health Workers during the COVID-19 Epidemic in Chinabreakdown → | 1122 |
| 11 | 44 | |
| 12 | 31 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 4 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 39 | |
| 18 | 30 | |
| 19 | Application of Evaluation on Working Fatigue Based on Improved Fuzzy Borda Method | 1 |
| 20 | 1 |
About Qing Xue
Qing Xue is a scholar working on Neurology, Human-Computer Interaction and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 43 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Functional Brain Connectivity Studies (9 papers), Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Studies (7 papers) and EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (1.0k citations), General Health Professions (567 citations) and Applied Psychology (90 citations). Qing Xue has collaborated with scholars based in China, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Jiahong Qin, Guangqin Li, Yu‐Ping Wang, Peng Mao, Yuan Yang, Fiammetta Cosci, Qing Tian, Lu Yin, Wei Li and Hong Chang. Their work appears in journals such as IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, Epilepsia and Technological Forecasting and Social Change.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.