This map shows the geographic impact of QIN-ER YANG's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by QIN-ER YANG with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites QIN-ER YANG more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by QIN-ER YANG. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by QIN-ER YANG. The network helps show where QIN-ER YANG may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of QIN-ER YANG
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of QIN-ER YANG.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of QIN-ER YANG based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with QIN-ER YANG. QIN-ER YANG is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
YANG, QIN-ER. (2013). The Identity of Synotis cordifolia (Asteraceae-Senecioneae). Redai yaredai zhiwu xuebao.4 indexed citations
7.
Liu, Zhengyu, Ying Liu, & QIN-ER YANG. (2011). Sinosenecio nanchuanicus (Asteraceae), a New Species Small in Size Yet High in Chromosome Number from Chongqing, China. Botanical studies. 52(1). 105–113.3 indexed citations
8.
Liu, Ying & QIN-ER YANG. (2011). Sinosenecio sichuanicus (Asteraceae), a new species from Sichuan, China.. Botanical studies. 52(2). 219–223.4 indexed citations
9.
Liu, Ying & QIN-ER YANG. (2011). Hainanecio, a new genus of the Senecioneae, Asteraceae from China. Botanical studies. 52(1). 115–120.10 indexed citations
10.
Liu, Ying, et al.. (2011). Sinosenecio albonervius (Asteraceae), a new species from Hunan and Hubei, China. Botanical studies. 52(3). 359–365.1 indexed citations
11.
Liu, Ying & QIN-ER YANG. (2010). Sinosenecio yilingii (Asteraceae), a New Species from Sichuan, China. Botanical studies. 51(2). 269–275.8 indexed citations
12.
Liu, Ying, et al.. (2010). Sinosenecio hupingshanensis (Asteraceae), a new species from Hunan and Hubei, China.. Botanical studies. 51(3). 387–394.8 indexed citations
13.
Liu, Ying, et al.. (2009). Sinosenecio Baojingensis (Asteraceae), a New Species from Hunan, China. Botanical studies. 50(1). 107–113.8 indexed citations
14.
YUAN, QIONG & QIN-ER YANG. (2009). Anemone xingyiensis (Ranunculaceae), a new species from Guizhou, China.. Botanical studies. 50(4). 493–498.5 indexed citations
15.
Gao, Qi & QIN-ER YANG. (2009). Aconitum shennongjiaense (Ranunculaceae), a new species from Hubei, China. Botanical studies. 50(2). 251–259.3 indexed citations
16.
YANG, QIN-ER. (2002). Cytology of the tribe Trollieae and of the tribe Cimicifugeae in the Ranunculaceae: a comparative study. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 40(1). 52–65.8 indexed citations
17.
YANG, QIN-ER, et al.. (2001). The identity of Aconitum jiulongense W. T. Wang. Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 39(5). 443–446.1 indexed citations
18.
YANG, QIN-ER, et al.. (1995). The Karyotype of Beesia deltophylla and Its Systematic Significance. Journal of Systematics and Evolution. 33(3). 225–229.1 indexed citations
19.
YANG, QIN-ER. (1995). Karyotypes of Disporum sessile and Tupistra longispica (Liliaceae). 15(2). 158–162.2 indexed citations
20.
Kai-Yu, Pan & QIN-ER YANG. (1994). Karyotypes of Disanthus and Mytilaria (Hamamelidaceae). Acta Phytotaxonomica Sinica. 32(3). 235–239.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.