Pushkar Ramesh

710 total citations
9 papers, 509 citations indexed

About

Pushkar Ramesh is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Dermatology and Surgery. According to data from OpenAlex, Pushkar Ramesh has authored 9 papers receiving a total of 509 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Rehabilitation, 4 papers in Dermatology and 3 papers in Surgery. Recurrent topics in Pushkar Ramesh's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (4 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers). Pushkar Ramesh is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (6 papers), Dermatologic Treatments and Research (4 papers) and Body Contouring and Surgery (2 papers). Pushkar Ramesh collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Sweden and India. Pushkar Ramesh's co-authors include Dongsheng Jiang, Simon Christ, Donovan Correa‐Gallegos, Yuval Rinkevich, Juliane Wannemacher, Haifeng Ye, Thomas Volz, Ursula Mirastschijski, Qing Yu and Axel Walch and has published in prestigious journals such as Nature, Nature Communications and Nature Cell Biology.

In The Last Decade

Pushkar Ramesh

8 papers receiving 506 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Pushkar Ramesh Germany	7	251	151	106	98	85	9	509
Donovan Correa‐Gallegos Germany	9	295 1.2×	125 0.8×	134 1.3×	116 1.2×	111 1.3×	9	597
Juliane Wannemacher Germany	7	197 0.8×	150 1.0×	88 0.8×	74 0.8×	68 0.8×	8	478
Renee R. Wasko United States	5	249 1.0×	88 0.6×	88 0.8×	128 1.3×	168 2.0×	6	625
Bryan Duoto United States	3	232 0.9×	70 0.5×	100 0.9×	83 0.8×	107 1.3×	5	432
Jisun Cha United States	9	294 1.2×	105 0.7×	50 0.5×	105 1.1×	107 1.3×	26	657
Heather E. Talbott United States	3	281 1.1×	86 0.6×	64 0.6×	70 0.7×	164 1.9×	3	596
Arnetha J. Whitmore United States	7	174 0.7×	90 0.6×	74 0.7×	34 0.3×	106 1.2×	11	462
Julin Xie China	15	369 1.5×	108 0.7×	57 0.5×	93 0.9×	200 2.4×	17	658
Keijiro Hori Japan	10	218 0.9×	171 1.1×	48 0.5×	172 1.8×	81 1.0×	17	561
Noriko Aramaki‐Hattori Japan	12	94 0.4×	90 0.6×	80 0.8×	47 0.5×	133 1.6×	39	400

Countries citing papers authored by Pushkar Ramesh

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pushkar Ramesh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pushkar Ramesh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pushkar Ramesh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pushkar Ramesh

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pushkar Ramesh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pushkar Ramesh. The network helps show where Pushkar Ramesh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pushkar Ramesh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pushkar Ramesh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pushkar Ramesh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pushkar Ramesh. Pushkar Ramesh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

9 of 9 papers shown

1.

Kadri, Safwen, Martin Mück-Häusl, Wei Han, et al.. (2025). A mesothelial differentiation gateway drives fibrosis. Nature Communications. 16(1). 8295–8295.

2.

Dai, Ruoxuan, Ania Stefańska, Meshal Ansari, et al.. (2023). Wound infiltrating adipocytes are not myofibroblasts. Nature Communications. 14(1). 21 indexed citations

3.

Ramesh, Pushkar, Ruoxuan Dai, Haifeng Ye, et al.. (2022). Therapeutic Silencing of p120 in Fascia Fibroblasts Ameliorates Tissue Repair. Journal of Investigative Dermatology. 143(5). 854–863.e4. 7 indexed citations

4.

Wan, Li, Dongsheng Jiang, Donovan Correa‐Gallegos, et al.. (2021). Connexin43 gap junction drives fascia mobilization and repair of deep skin wounds. Matrix Biology. 97. 58–71. 37 indexed citations

5.

Koopmans, Tim, Pushkar Ramesh, Simon Christ, et al.. (2020). Post-surgical adhesions are triggered by calcium-dependent membrane bridges between mesothelial surfaces. Nature Communications. 11(1). 3068–3068. 60 indexed citations

6.

Jiang, Dongsheng, Simon Christ, Donovan Correa‐Gallegos, et al.. (2020). Injury triggers fascia fibroblast collective cell migration to drive scar formation through N-cadherin. Nature Communications. 11(1). 5653–5653. 96 indexed citations

7.

Correa‐Gallegos, Donovan, Dongsheng Jiang, Simon Christ, et al.. (2019). Patch repair of deep wounds by mobilized fascia. Nature. 576(7786). 287–292. 157 indexed citations

8.

Jiang, Dongsheng, Donovan Correa‐Gallegos, Simon Christ, et al.. (2018). Two succeeding fibroblastic lineages drive dermal development and the transition from regeneration to scarring. Nature Cell Biology. 20(4). 422–431. 130 indexed citations

9.

Ramesh, Pushkar, et al.. (2014). Response to autotomy in anesthetized freshwater crab, Paratelphusa hydrodromous (Herbst). 5(2). 27–28. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact