Prue McRae

35 papers receiving 625 citations

Peers

Prue McRae
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
  • Geriatrics and Gerontology 269
  • Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine 153
  • Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation 79
  • Issues, ethics and legal aspects 15
  • Research and Theory 9
Replace Jita G. Hoogerduijn with:
Jita G. Hoogerduijn Netherlands
Tom Braes Belgium
Orly Tonkikh Israel
Annette Lavezza United States
Myra Enloe United States
Maura Lusignani Italy
Mauro Zanocchi Italy
C. Bree Johnston United States
Jing Jiao China
José Carlos Canca‐Sánchez Spain
Prue McRae relative to Jita G. Hoogerduijn Netherlands Jita G. Hoogerduijn's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.0×
Jita G. Hoogerduijn · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Prue McRae

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Prue McRae's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prue McRae with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prue McRae more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Prue McRae

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prue McRae. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prue McRae. The network helps show where Prue McRae may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Prue McRae, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Prue McRae Line = papers co-authored together Prue McRae links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 37 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 201673
2 201369
3 201861
4 201648
5 202046
6 201742
7 202241
8 200932
9 201630
10 201429
11 200817
12 201917
13 202115
14 202114
15 202013
16 201312
17 20239
18 20217
19 20207
20 20136

About Prue McRae

Prue McRae is a scholar working on General Health Professions, Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine, Geriatrics and Gerontology, Psychiatry and Mental health and Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, having authored 37 papers that have together received 638 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Intensive Care Unit Cognitive Disorders (16 papers), Frailty in Older Adults (15 papers), Geriatric Care and Nursing Homes (12 papers), Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention (5 papers), Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes (5 papers), Nutrition and Health in Aging (4 papers), Health Sciences Research and Education (3 papers) and Emergency and Acute Care Studies (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Geriatrics and Gerontology (269 citations), Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (153 citations), Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation (79 citations), Issues, ethics and legal aspects (15 citations) and Research and Theory (9 citations). Prue McRae has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Alison Mudge, Nancye M. Peel, Adrienne Young, Ruth E. Hubbard, Wen Kwang Lim, Adrian Barnett, Sharon K. Inouye, Philip J. Walker, Michael C. Reade and Peter Donovan. Their work appears in journals such as Australasian Journal on Ageing, BMC Health Services Research, Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, Physical Therapy and Age and Ageing.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact