Prince Peprah
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Health top 5%
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Williams Agyemang‐DuahEmmanuel Mawuli AbaloCharles PeprahFrancis Arthur-HolmesRazak M. GyasiAnthony Kwame MorganAkwasi Adjei GyimahDivine Odame Appiah
- Topics
- Global Maternal and Child Health (13 papers)Healthcare Systems and Reforms (10 papers)Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEScientific Reports
- Partner nations
- GhanaAustraliaUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Prince Peprah
66 papers receiving 881 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 128
- General Health Professions 320
- Health 168
- Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health 161
- Sociology and Political Science 146
- Clinical Psychology 132
Countries citing papers authored by Prince Peprah
This map shows the geographic impact of Prince Peprah's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Prince Peprah with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Prince Peprah more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Prince Peprah
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Prince Peprah. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Prince Peprah. The network helps show where Prince Peprah may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Prince Peprah
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Prince Peprah. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Prince Peprah based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Prince Peprah. Prince Peprah is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 10 | |
| 7 | 18 | |
| 8 | 5 | |
| 9 | 7 | |
| 10 | 4 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 6 | |
| 13 | 24 | |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 21 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 60 | |
| 18 | 16 | |
| 19 | 38 | |
| 20 | 26 |
About Prince Peprah
Prince Peprah is a scholar working on Health, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology and Research and Theory, having authored 73 papers that have together received 916 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global Maternal and Child Health (13 papers), Healthcare Systems and Reforms (10 papers) and Health disparities and outcomes (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Health (168 citations), Research and Theory (13 citations) and General Health Professions (320 citations). Prince Peprah has collaborated with scholars based in Ghana, Australia and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Williams Agyemang‐Duah, Emmanuel Mawuli Abalo, Charles Peprah, Francis Arthur-Holmes, Razak M. Gyasi, Anthony Kwame Morgan, Akwasi Adjei Gyimah, Divine Odame Appiah, Bernard Yeboah‐Asiamah Asare and Emmanuel Appiah-Brempong. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.