Pria Nippak

451 total citations
20 papers, 316 citations indexed

About

Pria Nippak is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Genetics and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Pria Nippak has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 316 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 5 papers in Genetics and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Pria Nippak's work include Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Pria Nippak is often cited by papers focused on Human-Animal Interaction Studies (5 papers), Hemispheric Asymmetry in Neuroscience (3 papers) and Memory and Neural Mechanisms (3 papers). Pria Nippak collaborates with scholars based in Canada and United States. Pria Nippak's co-authors include Norton W. Milgram, Candace J Ikeda-Douglas, Bruce A. Muggenburg, Heather Murphey, Carl W. Cotman, Elizabeth Head, Alan Chan, Julien Meyer, J.R. Mendelson and Bernard Têtu and has published in prestigious journals such as Brain Research, Medicine and Behavioral Neuroscience.

In The Last Decade

Pria Nippak

20 papers receiving 304 citations

Peers

Pria Nippak

GENET

SP

PHYSI

CN

MB

Mohammed Al‐Houqani United Arab Emirates

Rachel A. Bishop United States

Michelle Rosgaard Birknow Denmark

Jamie Johnson United States

Anthony T. Dugbartey United States

Marion Friedl Germany

Fengjie Gao China

Rūta Mameniškienė Lithuania

A Thomann Germany

Heather Jordan United States

Mohammed Al‐Houqani United Arab Emirates

Pria Nippak

75 ×0.6

GENET

43 ×0.7

SP

103 ×1.8

PHYSI

137 ×2.4

CN

75 ×1.9

MB

Citations per year, relative to Pria Nippak Pria Nippak (= 1×) peers Mohammed Al‐Houqani

Countries citing papers authored by Pria Nippak

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pria Nippak's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pria Nippak with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pria Nippak more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pria Nippak

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pria Nippak. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pria Nippak. The network helps show where Pria Nippak may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pria Nippak

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pria Nippak. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pria Nippak based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pria Nippak. Pria Nippak is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

1.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2022). Understanding the Experience of Geriatric Care Professionals in Using Telemedicine to Care for Older Patients in Response to the COVID-19 Pandemic: Mixed Methods Study. JMIR Aging. 5(3). e34952–e34952. 12 indexed citations

2.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2022). Opioid prescribing practices in trauma patients at discharge: An exploratory retrospective chart analysis. Medicine. 101(42). e31047–e31047. 3 indexed citations

3.

Meyer, Julien, et al.. (2022). Impact of artificial intelligence on pathologists’ decisions: an experiment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association. 29(10). 1688–1695. 19 indexed citations

4.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2021). Evaluation of an Online System for Routine Outcome Monitoring: Cross-sectional Survey Study. JMIR Mental Health. 8(12). e29243–e29243. 3 indexed citations

5.

Siemens, D. Robert, et al.. (2020). Histology at transurethral resection of bladder tumor and radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: Insights from population-based data. Canadian Urological Association Journal. 15(4). 138–140. 4 indexed citations

6.

Meyer, Julien, et al.. (2020). Glucose point-of-care meter operators competency: An assessment checklist. Practical Laboratory Medicine. 20. e00157–e00157. 3 indexed citations

7.

Meyer, Julien, et al.. (2020). An evaluation of cleaning practices at a teaching hospital. American Journal of Infection Control. 49(1). 40–43. 19 indexed citations

8.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2018). Implementation of Medical Assistance in Dying: An evaluation of clinician knowledge and perceptions at a large urban multi-site rehabilitation centre in Toronto. Journal of Hospital Administration. 7(5). 41–41. 7 indexed citations

9.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2016). Survey of Institutional Policies for Provision of “CMV-Safe” Blood in Ontario. American Journal of Clinical Pathology. 146(5). 578–584. 3 indexed citations

10.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2015). Family attitudes towards an electronic personal health record in a long term care facility. Journal of Hospital Administration. 4(3). 9–9. 6 indexed citations

11.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2014). Evaluation of a regional ST-elevation myocardial infarction primary percutaneous coronary intervention program at the Rouge Valley Health System. BMC Health Services Research. 14(1). 449–449. 1 indexed citations

12.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2014). Designing and evaluating a balanced scorecard for a health information management department in a Canadian urban non-teaching hospital. Health Informatics Journal. 22(2). 120–139. 10 indexed citations

13.

Nippak, Pria, et al.. (2014). Is there a relation between emergency department and inpatient lengths of stay?. PubMed. 19(1). 12–20. 17 indexed citations

14.

Nippak, Pria. (2012). AN EVALUATION OF PRECEPTORS’ PERCEPTIONS OF THE PRACTICUM EXPERIENCE. 2640–2640. 1 indexed citations

15.

Nippak, Pria, J.R. Mendelson, Bruce A. Muggenburg, & Norton W. Milgram. (2007). Enhanced spatial ability in aged dogs following dietary and behavioural enrichment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory. 87(4). 610–623. 19 indexed citations

16.

Nippak, Pria, Candace J Ikeda-Douglas, & Norton W. Milgram. (2006). Extensive spatial training does not negate age differences in response latency. Brain Research. 1070(1). 171–188. 3 indexed citations

17.

Nippak, Pria & Norton W. Milgram. (2005). An investigation of the relationship between response latency across several cognitive tasks in the beagle dog. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 29(3). 371–377. 11 indexed citations

18.

Nippak, Pria, Alan Chan, Zachariah Campbell, et al.. (2003). Response latency in Canis familiaris: Mental ability or mental strategy?. Behavioral Neuroscience. 117(5). 1066–1075. 5 indexed citations

19.

Chan, Alan, Pria Nippak, Heather Murphey, et al.. (2002). Visuospatial impairments in aged canines (Canis familiaris): The role of cognitive-behavioral flexibility.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 116(3). 443–454. 83 indexed citations

20.

Chan, Alan, Pria Nippak, Heather Murphey, et al.. (2002). Visuospatial impairments in aged canines (Canis familiaris): The role of cognitive-behavioral flexibility.. Behavioral Neuroscience. 116(3). 443–454. 87 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact