Countries citing papers authored by Preben Clausen
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Preben Clausen's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Preben Clausen with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Preben Clausen more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Preben Clausen. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Preben Clausen. The network helps show where Preben Clausen may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Preben Clausen
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Preben Clausen.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Preben Clausen based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Preben Clausen. Preben Clausen is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fox, Anthony David, et al.. (2020). Non-stop autumn migrations of Light-bellied Brent Geese Branta bernicla hrota tracked by satellite telemetry – racing for the first Zostera bite?. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 70(70). 76–93.2 indexed citations
5.
Wood, Kevin A., Lei Cao, Preben Clausen, et al.. (2019). Current trends and future directions in swan research: insights from the 6th International Swan Symposium. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 1–34.6 indexed citations
6.
Bregnballe, Thomas, Preben Clausen, & Anthony David Fox. (2019). Responses of autumn-staging ducks and Coot Fulica atra to the Skjern River Valley wetland restoration project. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 69(69). 28–44.2 indexed citations
7.
Rees, Eileen C., Lei Cao, Preben Clausen, et al.. (2019). Conservation status of the world’s swan populations, Cygnus sp. and Coscoroba sp.: a review of current trends and gaps in knowledge. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 35–72.16 indexed citations
Koffijberg, Kees, et al.. (2013). The Netherlands as a winter refuge for Light-bellied Brent Geese Branta bernicla hrota. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust).1 indexed citations
12.
Clausen, Kevin Kuhlmann, et al.. (2013). Foraging range, habitat use and minimum flight distances of East Atlantic Light-bellied Brent Geese Branta bernicla hrota in their spring staging areas. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 26–39.6 indexed citations
13.
Ebbinge, B.S., Jan Blew, Preben Clausen, et al.. (2013). Population development and breeding success of Dark-bellied Brent Geese Branta b. bernicla from 1991–2011. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 2013(3). 74–89.5 indexed citations
14.
Holm, Thomas Eske & Preben Clausen. (2013). Kleptoparasitism as an important feeding strategy for migrating Wigeon Anas penelope. Wildfowl. 158–166.4 indexed citations
Bregnballe, Thomas, et al.. (2009). Habitat use and home range size of autumn staging radio-marked Teal Anas crecca at Ulvshale-Nyord, Denmark. Wildfowl (Wildfowl & Wetlands Trust). 100–114.2 indexed citations
Madsen, Jesper, Jeffrey L. Black, & Preben Clausen. (1998). Status of the Three Svalbard Goose Populations.1 indexed citations
20.
Clausen, Preben. (1998). Choosing Between Feeding on Zostera and Salt Marsh: Factors Affecting Habitat Use by Brent Geese in Spring.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.