Poh‐Gek Forkert

68 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Peers

Poh‐Gek Forkert
Comparison fields: 5 of 101
  • Pharmacology 474
  • Biochemistry 258
  • Cancer Research 384
  • Pharmaceutical Science 110
  • Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 436
Replace H.P. Witschi with:
H.P. Witschi United States
John G. Dent United States
Manfred Kiese Germany
Anders Tunek Sweden
Anne P. Autor United States
H. Uehleke Germany
Hanspeter Witschi United States
T.C. Orton United Kingdom
Ellappan Babu United States
Songrong Ren United States
Poh‐Gek Forkert relative to H.P. Witschi United States H.P. Witschi's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×10.5×
H.P. Witschi · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Poh‐Gek Forkert

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Poh‐Gek Forkert's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Poh‐Gek Forkert with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Poh‐Gek Forkert more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Poh‐Gek Forkert

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Poh‐Gek Forkert. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Poh‐Gek Forkert. The network helps show where Poh‐Gek Forkert may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Poh‐Gek Forkert, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Poh‐Gek Forkert Line = papers co-authored together Poh‐Gek Forkert links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 69 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1988285
2 201055
3 199552
4 198250
5 198539
6 200335
7 197735
8 199634
9 199732
10 198732
11 199131
12 198931
13 199430
14 198627
15 200427
16 199926
17 198925
18 200025
19 199525
20 199624

About Poh‐Gek Forkert

Poh‐Gek Forkert is a scholar working on Pharmacology, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research, Biochemistry and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine, having authored 69 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Pharmacogenetics and Drug Metabolism (25 papers), Carcinogens and Genotoxicity Assessment (20 papers), Eicosanoids and Hypertension Pharmacology (10 papers), Chemical Reactions and Isotopes (8 papers), Sulfur Compounds in Biology (8 papers), Glutathione Transferases and Polymorphisms (7 papers), Drug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms (7 papers) and Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Pharmacology (474 citations), Biochemistry (258 citations), Cancer Research (384 citations), Pharmaceutical Science (110 citations) and Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine (436 citations). Poh‐Gek Forkert has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Bangladesh. Frequent co-authors include Alison B. Froese, Madeleine Moussa, Edward S. Reynolds, Taylor F. Dowsley, Judith B. Ulreich, Daniel W. Birch, Thomas E. Massey, H V Gelboin, John S. Poland and William J. Racz. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Drug Metabolism and Disposition, Canadian Journal of Physiology and Pharmacology, American Journal of Respiratory Cell and Molecular Biology and Carcinogenesis.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact