P.J.C.M. van Hoof

414 citations
16 papers · 355 indexed · h-index 9
Topics
Crystallization and Solubility Studies (12 papers)nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (10 papers)Petroleum Processing and Analysis (2 papers)
Partner nations
Netherlands

In The Last Decade

P.J.C.M. van Hoof

16 papers receiving 348 citations

Peers

P.J.C.M. van Hoof
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Materials Chemistry 256
  • Atmospheric Science 70
  • Physical and Theoretical Chemistry 67
  • Biomaterials 48
  • Organic Chemistry 45
Replace R.M. Geertman with:
R.M. Geertman Netherlands
Ryan C. Snyder United States
Darren F. Rosenbaum United States
S. Sasaki Japan
G. Power Ireland
Guangjun Han Singapore
Venkateswarlu Bhamidi United States
Sigbjørn Løland Bore Norway
Guangwen He Singapore
Carl J. Tilbury United States
P.J.C.M. van Hoof relative to R.M. Geertman Netherlands R.M. Geertman's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.3×
R.M. Geertman · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by P.J.C.M. van Hoof

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of P.J.C.M. van Hoof's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by P.J.C.M. van Hoof with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites P.J.C.M. van Hoof more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by P.J.C.M. van Hoof

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by P.J.C.M. van Hoof. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by P.J.C.M. van Hoof. The network helps show where P.J.C.M. van Hoof may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of P.J.C.M. van Hoof

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of P.J.C.M. van Hoof. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of P.J.C.M. van Hoof based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with P.J.C.M. van Hoof. P.J.C.M. van Hoof is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

16 of 16 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 21
2 54
3 8
4 116
5 20
6 29
7
Modeling and simulating work practices from Apollo 12.
6
8 9
9 10
10 2
11 44
12 8
13 13
14 8
15
Kinetic roughening of Kossel (100) surfaces
1
16 6

About P.J.C.M. van Hoof

P.J.C.M. van Hoof is a scholar working on Atmospheric Science, Materials Chemistry and Physical and Theoretical Chemistry, having authored 16 papers that have together received 355 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Crystallization and Solubility Studies (12 papers), nanoparticles nucleation surface interactions (10 papers) and Petroleum Processing and Analysis (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Physical and Theoretical Chemistry (67 citations), Materials Chemistry (256 citations) and Atmospheric Science (70 citations). P.J.C.M. van Hoof has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Hugo Meekes, Elias Vlieg, F. M. Kaspersen, Cristina Stoica, P. Verwer, W.J.P. van Enckevort, P. Bennema, E. van Veenendaal, J. van Suchtelen and Paul Tinnemans. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Physical Chemistry B, International Journal of Pharmaceutics and Surface Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026