This map shows the geographic impact of PJ Ell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by PJ Ell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites PJ Ell more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by PJ Ell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by PJ Ell. The network helps show where PJ Ell may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of PJ Ell
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of PJ Ell.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of PJ Ell based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with PJ Ell. PJ Ell is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Win, Thida, Joanna C. Porter, Raymond Endozo, et al.. (2012). Novel Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography of Diffuse Parenchymal Lung Disease Combining a Labeled Somatostatin Receptor Analogue and 2-Deoxy-2[F-18]Fluoro-D-Glucose. Bern Open Repository and Information System (University of Bern).
2.
Kayani, Irfan, et al.. (2007). The impact of F-18-FDG PET/CT in patients with liver metastases. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
3.
Ell, PJ. (2004). The Sentinel Lymph Node in breast cancer.. UCL Discovery (University College London).
4.
Erlandsson, Kjell, et al.. (2004). Estimation of SSR1 occupancy of SERT using the novel SPET tracer [123I]ADAM and simultaneous modeling. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
5.
Erlandsson, Kjell, et al.. (2004). Measuring SSRI occupancy of SERT using the novel SPET tracer [123I] ADAM.. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
6.
Visvikis, Dimitris, et al.. (2003). The impact of FDG PET/CT in colorectal cancer - An outcome study.. UCL Discovery (University College London).3 indexed citations
7.
Lee, Acw, et al.. (2002). Optical biopsy: The technique and experience in determining lymph node status in breast cancer. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
8.
Visvikis, Dimitris, et al.. (2002). Quantitative comparison of 18FDG and 18FLT in colorectal carcinoma. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
9.
Costa, Durval C., et al.. (2001). The clinical role of positron emission tomography. UCL Discovery (University College London).2 indexed citations
Kapur, Akhil, et al.. (1999). The ROBUST study: a randomised comparison of three tracers for myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. UCL Discovery (University College London).1 indexed citations
12.
Anagnostopoulos, Constantinos, et al.. (1997). Gated technetium-99m-tetrofosmin SPECT and cine MRI to assess left ventricular contraction.. PubMed. 38(3). 438–42.53 indexed citations
Ell, PJ, et al.. (1980). The management of disease and radionuclide section scanning.. PubMed. 24(3). 225–31.2 indexed citations
19.
Ell, PJ, et al.. (1978). Peroperative nuclear medicine: the portable gamma camera on-line to a computer, as a diagnostic service to the surgeon.. PubMed. 17(2). 78–80.1 indexed citations
20.
Ell, PJ, et al.. (1977). Whole-body bone scans in patients with plasmacytoma. Typical pattern of "hot-spots" in the rib cage.. Munich Personal RePEc Archive (Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich). 16(4). 195–7.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.