Pit Staiger-Sälzer

658 total citations
8 papers, 450 citations indexed

About

Pit Staiger-Sälzer is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Human-Computer Interaction. According to data from OpenAlex, Pit Staiger-Sälzer has authored 8 papers receiving a total of 450 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 6 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 3 papers in Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and 3 papers in Human-Computer Interaction. Recurrent topics in Pit Staiger-Sälzer's work include EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). Pit Staiger-Sälzer is often cited by papers focused on EEG and Brain-Computer Interfaces (6 papers), Gaze Tracking and Assistive Technology (3 papers) and Neuroscience and Neural Engineering (3 papers). Pit Staiger-Sälzer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Italy and Norway. Pit Staiger-Sälzer's co-authors include Andrea Kübler, Elisa Mira Holz, Evert-Jan Hoogerwerf, Donatella Mattia, Michael Tangermann, Johannes Höhne, Angela Riccio, Lorenzo Desideri, Claudia Zickler and Tobias Kaufmann and has published in prestigious journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Neuroscience and Artificial Intelligence in Medicine.

In The Last Decade

Pit Staiger-Sälzer

8 papers receiving 433 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Pit Staiger-Sälzer Germany 5 423 250 141 60 52 8 450
Loïc Botrel Germany 8 396 0.9× 152 0.6× 62 0.4× 39 0.7× 34 0.7× 16 432
Debra Zeitlin United States 5 290 0.7× 182 0.7× 72 0.5× 32 0.5× 45 0.9× 6 309
David B. Ryan United States 9 556 1.3× 335 1.3× 155 1.1× 144 2.4× 47 0.9× 14 579
Simona Bufalari Italy 6 362 0.9× 168 0.7× 87 0.6× 68 1.1× 45 0.9× 9 407
Betts Peters United States 11 306 0.7× 125 0.5× 96 0.7× 31 0.5× 20 0.4× 20 391
N. Ghanayim Germany 6 644 1.5× 391 1.6× 128 0.9× 142 2.4× 76 1.5× 7 676
Christoph Pokorny Austria 12 325 0.8× 181 0.7× 61 0.4× 48 0.8× 27 0.5× 22 372
Elmar Pels Netherlands 9 511 1.2× 348 1.4× 49 0.3× 126 2.1× 68 1.3× 15 587
Andrew Myrden Canada 7 281 0.7× 87 0.3× 63 0.4× 40 0.7× 37 0.7× 8 313
Petar Horki Austria 9 541 1.3× 343 1.4× 162 1.1× 131 2.2× 47 0.9× 19 582

Countries citing papers authored by Pit Staiger-Sälzer

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Pit Staiger-Sälzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Pit Staiger-Sälzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Pit Staiger-Sälzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Pit Staiger-Sälzer

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Pit Staiger-Sälzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Pit Staiger-Sälzer. The network helps show where Pit Staiger-Sälzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Pit Staiger-Sälzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Pit Staiger-Sälzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Pit Staiger-Sälzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Pit Staiger-Sälzer. Pit Staiger-Sälzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

8 of 8 papers shown
1.
Kleih, Sonja C., et al.. (2015). The WIN-speller: a new intuitive auditory brain-computer interface spelling application. Frontiers in Neuroscience. 9. 346–346. 21 indexed citations
2.
Kübler, Andrea, Elisa Mira Holz, Angela Riccio, et al.. (2014). The User-Centered Design as Novel Perspective for Evaluating the Usability of BCI-Controlled Applications. PLoS ONE. 9(12). e112392–e112392. 156 indexed citations
3.
Höhne, Johannes, Elisa Mira Holz, Pit Staiger-Sälzer, et al.. (2014). Motor Imagery for Severely Motor-Impaired Patients: Evidence for Brain-Computer Interfacing as Superior Control Solution. PLoS ONE. 9(8). e104854–e104854. 61 indexed citations
4.
Holz, Elisa Mira, Johannes Höhne, Pit Staiger-Sälzer, Michael Tangermann, & Andrea Kübler. (2013). Brain–computer interface controlled gaming: Evaluation of usability by severely motor restricted end-users. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. 59(2). 111–120. 82 indexed citations
5.
Zickler, Claudia, Angela Riccio, Francesco Leotta, et al.. (2011). A Brain-Computer Interface as Input Channel for a Standard Assistive Technology Software. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience. 42(4). 236–244. 122 indexed citations
6.
Zickler, Claudia, Abdul Al-Khodairy, Andrea Kübler, et al.. (2010). BCI-Applications: Needs and requirements of disabled end-users and professional users. 2 indexed citations
7.
Zickler, Claudia, Vera Kaiser, Abdul Al-Khodairy, et al.. (2010). BCI- Applications: Requirements of Disabled End-Users and Professional Users. 29–29. 2 indexed citations
8.
Neuper, Ch., Gernot Müller, Pit Staiger-Sälzer, et al.. (2003). „EEG-basierende Kommunikation” - ein neues Konzept zur rehabilitativen Unterstützung von Patienten mit schwerer motorischer Beeinträchtigung. Die Rehabilitation. 42(6). 371–377. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026