Ping‐Sheng Koh

3.0k total citations · 2 hit papers
27 papers, 2.2k citations indexed

About

Ping‐Sheng Koh is a scholar working on Accounting, Strategy and Management and Economics and Econometrics. According to data from OpenAlex, Ping‐Sheng Koh has authored 27 papers receiving a total of 2.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Accounting, 16 papers in Strategy and Management and 8 papers in Economics and Econometrics. Recurrent topics in Ping‐Sheng Koh's work include Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (11 papers). Ping‐Sheng Koh is often cited by papers focused on Corporate Finance and Governance (19 papers), Auditing, Earnings Management, Governance (16 papers) and Financial Reporting and Valuation Research (11 papers). Ping‐Sheng Koh collaborates with scholars based in Australia, Hong Kong and Singapore. Ping‐Sheng Koh's co-authors include David M. Reeb, Heli Wang, Cuili Qian, Jayne M. Godfrey, Yen H. Tong, Philip Gray, Keryn Chalmers, Ilya Cuypers, G P Stapledon and Stacie Kelley Laplante and has published in prestigious journals such as Strategic Management Journal, Management Science and Organization Science.

In The Last Decade

Ping‐Sheng Koh

25 papers receiving 2.0k citations

Hit Papers

Missing R&D 2013 2026 2017 2021 2015 2013 100 200 300 400

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ping‐Sheng Koh Australia 15 1.8k 1.2k 428 338 211 27 2.2k
Kun Tracy Wang Australia 20 1.2k 0.7× 866 0.7× 320 0.7× 273 0.8× 260 1.2× 66 1.7k
Yangxin Yu Hong Kong 19 1.2k 0.7× 749 0.6× 397 0.9× 238 0.7× 225 1.1× 41 1.6k
Gaoliang Tian China 21 1.1k 0.6× 855 0.7× 232 0.5× 258 0.8× 312 1.5× 84 1.6k
Xin Deng Singapore 7 1.1k 0.6× 1.1k 0.9× 319 0.7× 366 1.1× 385 1.8× 11 1.6k
Rezaul Kabir Netherlands 19 1.9k 1.1× 860 0.7× 536 1.3× 487 1.4× 98 0.5× 47 2.3k
Olubunmi Faleye United States 19 1.8k 1.0× 744 0.6× 467 1.1× 435 1.3× 102 0.5× 31 2.1k
Marcus L. Caylor United States 12 1.8k 1.0× 897 0.7× 464 1.1× 197 0.6× 83 0.4× 21 2.0k
Jayanthi Sunder United States 17 1.9k 1.1× 774 0.6× 977 2.3× 436 1.3× 112 0.5× 34 2.3k
Xiaoyun Yu United States 15 1.4k 0.8× 713 0.6× 502 1.2× 491 1.5× 111 0.5× 45 1.9k

Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Sheng Koh

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Sheng Koh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Sheng Koh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Sheng Koh more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping‐Sheng Koh

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Sheng Koh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Sheng Koh. The network helps show where Ping‐Sheng Koh may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ping‐Sheng Koh

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ping‐Sheng Koh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ping‐Sheng Koh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ping‐Sheng Koh. Ping‐Sheng Koh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, et al.. (2024). Strategic alliances and analysts’ forecasting performance. Accounting and Business Research. 56(1). 140–181. 1 indexed citations
2.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, David M. Reeb, Elvira Sojli, Wing Wah Tham, & Wendun Wang. (2021). Deleting Unreported Innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 57(6). 2324–2354.
3.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, David M. Reeb, & Wanli Zhao. (2017). CEO Confidence and Unreported R&D. Management Science. 64(12). 5725–5747. 64 indexed citations
4.
Reeb, David M., Ping‐Sheng Koh, Elvira Sojli, & Wing Wah Tham. (2016). Measuring innovation around the world. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
5.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng & David M. Reeb. (2015). Missing R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 60(1). 73–94. 419 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, Cuili Qian, & Heli Wang. (2013). Firm Litigation Risk and the Insurance Value of Corporate Social Performance. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University). 8 indexed citations
7.
Gray, Philip, Ping‐Sheng Koh, & Yen H. Tong. (2009). Accruals Quality, Information Risk and Cost of Capital: Evidence from Australia. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting. 36(1-2). 51–72. 156 indexed citations
8.
Lennox, Clive S., Jeffrey Pittman, Kevin Chen, et al.. (2008). Auditing the Auditors: Evidence on the Recent Reforms to the External Monitoring of Audit Firms*. SSRN Electronic Journal. 32 indexed citations
9.
Godfrey, Jayne M. & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2008). Goodwill impairment as a reflection of investment opportunities. Accounting and Finance. 49(1). 117–140. 71 indexed citations
10.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, et al.. (2007). The association between employee stock option disclosures and corporate governance: Evidence from an enhanced disclosure regime. The British Accounting Review. 39(4). 303–322. 67 indexed citations
11.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng. (2007). Institutional investor type, earnings management and benchmark beaters. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy. 26(3). 267–299. 210 indexed citations
12.
Chalmers, Keryn, Ping‐Sheng Koh, & G P Stapledon. (2006). The determinants of CEO compensation: Rent extraction or labour demand?. The British Accounting Review. 38(3). 259–275. 97 indexed citations
13.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, et al.. (2005). Accountability and Value Creation Roles of Corporate Governance. SSRN Electronic Journal. 1 indexed citations
14.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng. (2005). Institutional Ownership and Income Smoothing: Australian Evidence. Accounting Research Journal. 18(2). 93–110. 18 indexed citations
15.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng. (2003). On the Association between Institutional Ownership and Aggressive Corporate Earnings Management in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania). 11 indexed citations
16.
Bradbury, Michael E., Jayne M. Godfrey, & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2003). Investment Opportunity Set Influence on Goodwill Amortization. SSRN Electronic Journal. 2 indexed citations
17.
Chalmers, Keryn, et al.. (2003). The Determinants of CEO Compensation: Rent Extraction or Labour Demand?. SSRN Electronic Journal. 12 indexed citations
18.
Godfrey, Jayne M. & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2003). The association between firms' public finance issues and earnings management. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 16(2). 102–116. 4 indexed citations
19.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, et al.. (2003). The value relevance of employee stock options: A cross-country comparison. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 103–103.
20.
Godfrey, Jayne M. & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2001). The Relevance to Firm Valuation of Capitalising Intangible Assets in Total and by Category. Australian Accounting Review. 11(24). 39–48. 79 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026