Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Missing R&D
2015419 citationsPing‐Sheng Koh, David M. ReebJournal of Accounting and Economicsprofile →
Firm litigation risk and the insurance value of corporate social performance
2013339 citationsPing‐Sheng Koh, Cuili Qian et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Ping‐Sheng Koh
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Ping‐Sheng Koh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping‐Sheng Koh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping‐Sheng Koh more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping‐Sheng Koh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping‐Sheng Koh. The network helps show where Ping‐Sheng Koh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ping‐Sheng Koh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ping‐Sheng Koh.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ping‐Sheng Koh based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Ping‐Sheng Koh. Ping‐Sheng Koh is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, David M. Reeb, Elvira Sojli, Wing Wah Tham, & Wendun Wang. (2021). Deleting Unreported Innovation. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. 57(6). 2324–2354.
3.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, David M. Reeb, & Wanli Zhao. (2017). CEO Confidence and Unreported R&D. Management Science. 64(12). 5725–5747.64 indexed citations
4.
Reeb, David M., Ping‐Sheng Koh, Elvira Sojli, & Wing Wah Tham. (2016). Measuring innovation around the world. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
5.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng & David M. Reeb. (2015). Missing R&D. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 60(1). 73–94.419 indexed citations breakdown →
6.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, Cuili Qian, & Heli Wang. (2013). Firm Litigation Risk and the Insurance Value of Corporate Social Performance. Institutional Knowledge (InK) - Institutional Knowledge at Singapore Management University (Singapore Management University).8 indexed citations
Lennox, Clive S., Jeffrey Pittman, Kevin Chen, et al.. (2008). Auditing the Auditors: Evidence on the Recent Reforms to the External Monitoring of Audit Firms*. SSRN Electronic Journal.32 indexed citations
Koh, Ping‐Sheng. (2003). On the Association between Institutional Ownership and Aggressive Corporate Earnings Management in Australia. eCite Digital Repository (University of Tasmania).11 indexed citations
16.
Bradbury, Michael E., Jayne M. Godfrey, & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2003). Investment Opportunity Set Influence on Goodwill Amortization. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Godfrey, Jayne M. & Ping‐Sheng Koh. (2003). The association between firms' public finance issues and earnings management. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 16(2). 102–116.4 indexed citations
19.
Koh, Ping‐Sheng, et al.. (2003). The value relevance of employee stock options: A cross-country comparison. Queensland's institutional digital repository (The University of Queensland). 103–103.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.