Ping Situ

1.6k total citations
48 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

Ping Situ is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and Dermatology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ping Situ has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 31 papers in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, 11 papers in Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging and 8 papers in Dermatology. Recurrent topics in Ping Situ's work include Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (31 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers). Ping Situ is often cited by papers focused on Ocular Surface and Contact Lens (31 papers), Glaucoma and retinal disorders (7 papers) and Olfactory and Sensory Function Studies (7 papers). Ping Situ collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Ping Situ's co-authors include Trefford Simpson, Desmond Fonn, Lyndon Jones, Carolyn G. Begley, Nancy Keir, Caroline A. Blackie, William Ngo, Donald R. Korb, Rènée du Toit and David B. Elliott and has published in prestigious journals such as Vision Research, Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science and Cells.

In The Last Decade

Ping Situ

47 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ping Situ Canada 17 1.0k 489 478 225 195 48 1.2k
Alberto López‐Miguel Spain 20 807 0.8× 728 1.5× 610 1.3× 207 0.9× 158 0.8× 76 1.2k
Cécile Maïssa United Kingdom 18 1.2k 1.2× 628 1.3× 572 1.2× 188 0.8× 257 1.3× 55 1.4k
Joan M. Exford United States 6 786 0.8× 385 0.8× 445 0.9× 150 0.7× 242 1.2× 15 897
Juan Murube Spain 18 843 0.8× 614 1.3× 531 1.1× 124 0.6× 138 0.7× 92 1.2k
Yukiko Sonomura Japan 13 968 0.9× 252 0.5× 374 0.8× 407 1.8× 257 1.3× 25 1.1k
Kathy Dumbleton Canada 15 2.2k 2.1× 929 1.9× 1.1k 2.2× 515 2.3× 471 2.4× 31 2.3k
Aoi Komuro Japan 22 1.8k 1.7× 793 1.6× 745 1.6× 500 2.2× 359 1.8× 66 2.0k
Andrew D. Graham United States 17 659 0.6× 439 0.9× 387 0.8× 82 0.4× 85 0.4× 52 858
Kazuo Tsubota Japan 16 676 0.7× 533 1.1× 278 0.6× 103 0.5× 67 0.3× 25 922
Victor M. Finnemore United States 14 1.4k 1.3× 526 1.1× 637 1.3× 263 1.2× 385 2.0× 24 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Situ

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Situ's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Situ with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Situ more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Situ

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Situ. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Situ. The network helps show where Ping Situ may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ping Situ

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ping Situ. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ping Situ based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ping Situ. Ping Situ is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Begley, Carolyn G., Barbara Caffery, Robin L. Chalmers, et al.. (2019). Review and analysis of grading scales for ocular surface staining. The Ocular Surface. 17(2). 208–220. 84 indexed citations
2.
Xia, Jingfeng, Yue Li, & Ping Situ. (2017). An Overview of Predatory Journal Publishing in Asia. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 2017(165). 4. 6 indexed citations
3.
Begley, Carolyn G., et al.. (2017). A link between tear breakup and symptoms of ocular irritation. The Ocular Surface. 15(4). 696–703. 16 indexed citations
4.
Situ, Ping, Trefford Simpson, & Carolyn G. Begley. (2016). Hypersensitivity to Cold Stimuli in Symptomatic Contact Lens Wearers. Optometry and Vision Science. 93(8). 909–916. 16 indexed citations
5.
Jansen, Meredith E., et al.. (2016). Characterizing Contact Lens–Related Corneal Infiltrates. Cornea. 35(12). 1578–1583. 3 indexed citations
6.
Situ, Ping, Trefford Simpson, & Carolyn G. Begley. (2015). Test-retest repeatability and calibration of a new automated Belmonte esthesiometer. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 56(7). 6080–6080. 2 indexed citations
7.
Zhang, Jun, et al.. (2014). Visual Disturbance and Ocular Irritation in an Experimentally Induced Tear Film Instability Model. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 1989–1989. 1 indexed citations
8.
Dillehay, Sally M., et al.. (2014). Comparison of Three Power Levels of A Novel Soft Contact Lens Optical Design to Reduce Suspected Risk Factors for the Progression of Juvenile Onset Myopia.. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 55(13). 3637–3637. 1 indexed citations
9.
Situ, Ping. (2014). Ma vie en rose. Publications Docs-en-stock.com. 2 indexed citations
10.
Situ, Ping, et al.. (2013). Validation of the Current Symptoms Questionnaire (CSQ): a meta-analytical approach. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 54(15). 6023–6023. 5 indexed citations
11.
Begley, Carolyn G., et al.. (2013). The Effects of Mild Ocular Surface Stimulation and Concentration on Spontaneous Blink Parameters. Current Eye Research. 39(1). 9–20. 14 indexed citations
12.
Ngo, William, Ping Situ, Nancy Keir, et al.. (2013). Psychometric Properties and Validation of the Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness Questionnaire. Cornea. 32(9). 1204–1210. 216 indexed citations
13.
Situ, Ping, David J. McCanna, Maud Gorbet, & Lyndon Jones. (2012). Confocal Imaging Of Hyper-reflective Corneal Epithelial Cells During And After Contact Lens Wear. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 53(14). 4698–4698. 1 indexed citations
14.
Situ, Ping. (2008). New Concept of Collection Management: A Survey of Library Space-Related Issues. ScholarsArchive (Brigham Young University). 2008(144). 3. 1 indexed citations
15.
Jones, Lyndon, Nancy Keir, Ping Situ, & Desmond Fonn. (2005). The Impact of Post–Insertion Time on Corneal Staining and Comfort With Group II Hydrogel Materials Disinfected With Various Lens Care Regimens. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 46(13). 917–917. 5 indexed citations
16.
Toit, Rènée du, et al.. (2001). The Effects of Six Months of Contact Lens Wear on the Tear Film, Ocular Surfaces, and Symptoms of Presbyopes. Optometry and Vision Science. 78(6). 455–462. 64 indexed citations
17.
Fonn, Desmond, et al.. (2000). (CL-217)DETERMINATION OF LENS PRESCRIPTION FOR MONOVISION AND ACUVUE BIFOCAL CONTACT LENSES. Optometry and Vision Science. 77(SUPPLEMENT). 160–160. 1 indexed citations
18.
Situ, Ping, et al.. (2000). (CL-216)RESULTS OF A ONE YEAR CLINICAL TRIAL COMPARING MONOVISION AND BIFOCAL CONTACT LENSES. Optometry and Vision Science. 77(SUPPLEMENT). 18–18. 1 indexed citations
19.
Elliott, David B. & Ping Situ. (1998). Visual acuity versus letter contrast sensitivity in early cataract. Vision Research. 38(13). 2047–2052. 63 indexed citations
20.
Fonn, Desmond, Ping Situ, & Nicola Pritchard. (1997). The incidence of corneal infiltrates and ulcers in daily and extended wear clinical trials. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026