Ping Chook

54 papers receiving 2.3k citations

Peers

Ping Chook
Comparison fields: 5 of 118
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 981
  • Rheumatology 549
  • Complementary and alternative medicine 167
  • Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 305
  • Obstetrics and Gynecology 137
Replace Jonathan Goodfellow with:
Jonathan Goodfellow United Kingdom
I.F.W. McDowell United Kingdom
Apostolos Hatzitolios Greece
Christos Papamichael Greece
Renzhe Cui Japan
Ronald G. Munger United States
Xianhui Qin China
Enrico Vizzardi Italy
Στέλλα Δούμα Greece
Umberto Campia United States
Ping Chook relative to Jonathan Goodfellow United Kingdom Jonathan Goodfellow's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×
Jonathan Goodfellow · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ping Chook

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ping Chook's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ping Chook with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ping Chook more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ping Chook

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ping Chook. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ping Chook. The network helps show where Ping Chook may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ping Chook, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ping Chook Line = papers co-authored together Ping Chook links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 57 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1997420
2 2004349
3 2004256
4 1999248
5 199998
6 200496
7 200785
8 200975
9 200270
10 200153
11 200049
12 199746
13 200240
14 201336
15 201231
16 202031
17 200629
18 201426
19 201425
20 199725

About Ping Chook

Ping Chook is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Complementary and alternative medicine, Biochemistry, Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism and Obstetrics and Gynecology, having authored 57 papers that have together received 2.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiovascular Health and Disease Prevention (23 papers), Cardiovascular Disease and Adiposity (12 papers), Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins (9 papers), Folate and B Vitamins Research (7 papers), Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies (6 papers), Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases (6 papers), Air Quality and Health Impacts (5 papers) and Obstructive Sleep Apnea Research (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (981 citations), Rheumatology (549 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (167 citations), Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism (305 citations) and Obstetrics and Gynecology (137 citations). Ping Chook has collaborated with scholars based in Hong Kong, China and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Kam S. Woo, David S. Celermajer, John E. Sanderson, Yvette Lolin, Con Metreweli, C. Metreweli, Christopher Wai Kei Lam, Clare Chung-Wah Yu, R Y T Sung and Mu Qiao. Their work appears in journals such as International Journal of Cardiology, Evidence-based Complementary and Alternative Medicine, The journal of nutrition health & aging, Metabolic Syndrome and Related Disorders and Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026